Book cover

Supply Chain Resilience pp 33–39 Cite as

Supply Chain Resilience Framework

  • Lydia Novoszel 6  
  • First Online: 25 September 2022

2085 Accesses

Part of the Springer Series in Supply Chain Management book series (SSSCM,volume 17)

This framework is based on Kochan and Nowicki (International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 48(8), 842–865, 2018) and serves as overarching structure to link the various book contributions and theoretical concepts. Enhanced by additional elements derived from literature and industry feedback, this new framework links to the respective book chapters and outlines a structure for further supply chain resilience research and practical supply chain resilience investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
  • Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Chopra, S. (2019). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation . 7th edn, Global edition. Pearson.

Google Scholar  

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Chapter 39: Producing a systematic review. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). Editors Sage Publications Ltd.

Kochan, C., & Nowicki, D. R. (2018). Supply chain resilience: A systematic literature review and typological framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 48 (8), 842–865. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0099

Article   Google Scholar  

Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31 (1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (1985). Advantage. Creating and sustaining superior performance (pp. 56–68). Simons.

Ribeiro, J. P., & Barbosa-Póvoa, A. (2019). Supply chain resilience: An optimisation model to identify the relative importance of SC disturbances. In M. J. Alves, J. P. Almeida, J. F. Oliveira, & A. A. Pinto (Eds.), Operational research (pp. 189–198). Springer International Publishing.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Zavala-Alcívar, A., Verdecho, M.-J., & Alfaro-Saiz, J.-J. (2020). A conceptual framework to manage resilience and increase sustainability in the supply chain. Sustainability, 12 (16), 6300. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166300

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute for Transport and Logistics Management, WU (Vienna University of Economics and Business), Vienna, Austria

Lydia Novoszel

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lydia Novoszel .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Sebastian Kummer

Tina Wakolbinger

Alexander M. Geske

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Novoszel, L. (2022). Supply Chain Resilience Framework. In: Kummer, S., Wakolbinger, T., Novoszel, L., Geske, A.M. (eds) Supply Chain Resilience. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95401-7_3

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95401-7_3

Published : 25 September 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-95400-0

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-95401-7

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Publish with us

Policies and ethics

  • Find a journal
  • Track your research

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, insights from systematic literature review of supply chain resilience and disruption.

Benchmarking: An International Journal

ISSN : 1463-5771

Article publication date: 23 November 2021

Issue publication date: 2 September 2022

The study of supply chain disruption (SCD) and supply chain resilience (SCR) remains to be studied deeply in the field of business management. The purpose of this paper is to showcase a framework of SCR strategies to reduce the adverse effects of SCD using systematic literature review and data visualization.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a systematic literature review approach, the paper explores the concepts of supply chain disruption and supply chain resilience. Through rigorous systematic screening, authors studied papers on both the concepts and have proposed a framework for the same. The authors also have used data visualization and network diagram approaches for better understanding of the topic.

The systematic literature review of both the concepts brings out some exciting results which give a new direction to supply chain field. The outcome of this research also outlines numerous future research direction, which will be useful for the research community.

Practical implications

The numerous strategies of SCR should be implemented by manufacturing as well as a service organization. The framework reported in this research help academician and practitioners to understand SCR and to easily overcome any level of disruption. Supply chain managers must also formulate strategies accordingly and make plans to continually expand the system.

Originality/value

This research is the first such attempt to showcase a formal systematic framework and co-occurrence networks as well as overlay networks of SCR and SCD.

  • Systematic literature review
  • Supply chain disruption
  • Supply chain resilience
  • Co-occurrence networks
  • Supply chain risk
  • Supply chain vulnerability
  • Overlay network
  • Density network

Acknowledgements

The author is extremely grateful to anonymous referees whose constructive comments led to a substantial improvement of the paper. The author also would like to thank ICSSR, Delhi, India for wonderful support.

Agrawal, N. and Jain, R.K. (2022), "Insights from systematic literature review of supply chain resilience and disruption", Benchmarking: An International Journal , Vol. 29 No. 8, pp. 2495-2526. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2021-0084

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Logo of phenaturepg

Managing supply chain resilience in the era of VUCA

1 College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China

2 School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024 China

Shuibo Zhang

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (400K).

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 72031008, 71901161, and 71702020).

  • Ali I, Gölgeci I. Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2019; 49 (8):793–815. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2019-0038. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Anbumozhi V, Kimura F, Thangavelu S M. Global supply chain resilience: Vulnerability and shifting risk management strategies. In: Anbumozhi V, Kimura F, Thangavelu S M, editors. Supply Chain Resilience. Singapore: Springer; 2020. pp. 3–14. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Barney J B. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management. 2001; 27 (6):643–650. doi: 10.1177/014920630102700602. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Behzadi G, O’Sullivan M J, Olsen T L. On metrics for supply chain resilience. European Journal of Operational Research. 2020; 287 (1):145–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.040. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bennett N, Lemoine G J. What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review. 2014; 92 (1):27. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bier T, Lange A, Glock C H. Methods for mitigating disruptions in complex supply chain structures: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research. 2020; 58 (6):1835–1856. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1687954. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bode C, Wagner S M. Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. Journal of Operations Management. 2015; 36 (1):215–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.12.004. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chen J, Zhang H, Sun Y. Implementing coordination contracts in a manufacturer Stackelberg dual-channel supply chain. Omega. 2012; 40 (5):571–583. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2011.11.005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chowdhury M M H, Quaddus M. Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics. 2017; 188 :185–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Christopher M, Peck H. Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management. 2004; 15 (2):1–14. doi: 10.1108/09574090410700275. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Cohen M A, Kouvelis P. Revisit of AAA excellence of global value chains: Robustness, resilience, and realignment. Production and Operations Management. 2021; 30 (3):633–643. doi: 10.1111/poms.13305. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe S J, Fosso Wamba S, Roubaud D, Foropon C. Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research. 2021; 59 (1):110–128. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hohenstein N O, Feisel E, Hartmann E, Giunipero L. Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: A systematic review and paths for further investigation. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2015; 45 (1):90–117. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0128. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hosseini S, Ivanov D, Dolgui A. Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2019; 125 :285–307. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hosseini S, Morshedlou N, Ivanov D, Sarder M D, Barker K, Khaled A A. Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks. International Journal of Production Economics. 2019; 213 :124–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.018. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ivanov D, Sokolov B, Dolgui A. The ripple effect in supply chains: Trade-off “efficiency-flexibility-resilience” in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research. 2014; 52 (7):2154–2172. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.858836. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Johnson N, Elliott D, Drake P. Exploring the role of social capital in facilitating supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management. 2013; 18 (3):324–336. doi: 10.1108/SCM-06-2012-0203. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ju Y, Hou H, Yang J. Integration quality, value co-creation and resilience in logistics service supply chains: Moderating role of digital technology. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2021; 121 (2):364–380. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0445. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Jüttner U, Maklan S. Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management. 2011; 16 (4):246–259. doi: 10.1108/13598541111139062. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kim Y, Chen Y S, Linderman K. Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective. Journal of Operations Management. 2015; 33–34 :43–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.006. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Klibi W, Martel A. Modeling approaches for the design of resilient supply networks under disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics. 2012; 135 (2):882–898. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.10.028. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kochan C G, Nowicki D R. Supply chain resilience: A systematic literature review and typological framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2018; 48 (8):842–865. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0099. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lee H L. The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review. 2004; 82 (10):102–112. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Macdonald J R, Zobel C W, Melnyk S A, Griffis S E. Supply chain risk and resilience: Theory building through structured experiments and simulation. International Journal of Production Research. 2018; 56 (12):4337–4355. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1421787. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mack O, Khare A. Perspectives on a VUCA world. In: Mack O, Khare A, Krämer A, Burgartz T, editors. Managing in a VUCA World. Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 3–16. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Namdar J, Li X, Sawhney R, Pradhan N. Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research. 2018; 56 (6):2339–2360. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1370149. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ponis S T, Koronis E. Supply chain resilience: Definition of concept and its formative elements. Journal of Applied Business Research. 2012; 28 (5):921–929. doi: 10.19030/jabr.v28i5.7234. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ponomarov S Y, Holcomb M C. Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management. 2009; 20 (1):124–143. doi: 10.1108/09574090910954873. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Rezapour S, Farahani R Z, Pourakbar M. Resilient supply chain network design under competition: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research. 2017; 259 (3):1017–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.041. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Rice J B, Caniato F. Building a secure and resilient supply network. Supply Chain Management Review. 2003; 7 (5):22–30. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Simangunsong E, Hendry L C, Stevenson M. Supply-chain uncertainty: A review and theoretical foundation for future research. International Journal of Production Research. 2012; 50 (16):4493–4523. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.613864. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Tukamuhabwa B R, Stevenson M, Busby J, Zorzini M. Supply chain resilience: Definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. International Journal of Production Research. 2015; 53 (18):5592–5623. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Wieland A, Marcus Wallenburg C M. The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: A relational view. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2013; 43 (4):300–320. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2012-0243. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Yu W, Jacobs M A, Chavez R, Yang J. Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Economics. 2019; 218 :352–362. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.013. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zouari D, Ruel S, Viale L. Does digitalising the supply chain contribute to its resilience? International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2021; 51 (2):149–180. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2020-0038. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

A systematic literature review of the capabilities and performance metrics of supply chain resilience

  • Related Documents

Improving supply chain resilience through industry 4.0: a systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic

Digital supply chain performance metrics: a literature review.

Purpose In the previous decade, a substantial amount of research has been undertaken to measure the digitalized supply chain (DSC) performance. This paper aims to present a systematic literature review on DSC performance measurement metrics to apprehend current practices, recognize gaps and advocate future research itineraries. Design/methodology/approach To guarantee a replicable, rigorous and transparent research process, the authors used a systematic literature review methodology to synthesize the research. A combination of 25 keywords was used to obtain 248 scientific studies in the first step. The balance scorecard (BSC) model was used to categorize 299 gathered performance metrics into 4 BSC perspectives. Findings The review highlighted the need for qualitative performance measuring metrics for DSC. During the review, only one study was identified that primarily focused on developing performance metrics for DSC. Additionally, the review identified that metrics related to internal and financial perspectives received the most attention while the “growth and learning” perspective received the least attention. The review also identified that external partners, such as distributors and suppliers, were virtually ignored in previous literature. Originality/value Although numerous literature reviews have been conducted in the past on the performance measuring metrics for supply chain management, no literature review aiming to synthesize the measuring metrics for DSC has yet been undertaken.

Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological framework

PurposeThe study of supply chain resilience (SCRES) continues to gain interest in the academic and practitioner communities. The purpose of this paper is to present a focused review of the SCRES literature by investigating supply chain (SC) capabilities, their relationship to SCRES outcomes and the underpinning theoretical mechanisms of this relationship.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses the systematic literature review approach to examine 383 articles published between 2000 and 2017, ultimately down selecting to the most relevant 228 peer-reviewed studies. Context-interventions-mechanisms-outcomes (CIMO) logic is applied to organize and synthesize these peer-reviewed studies. A typological framework is developed from the CIMO-based classification of the SCRES literature.FindingsThe findings of this study outline the gaps in the SCRES literature and present an agenda for future research.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper presents an exploratory research; therefore, the typological model presented is just one of the possible perspectives.Practical implicationsThe typology of SCRES literature can help practitioners to understand SCRES and to measure and assess the resilience of SCs.Originality/valueThe paper provides clear definitions of SCRES constructs, develops a typological framework to further understand SCRES and identifies SCRES measures and assessment techniques.

Insights from systematic literature review of supply chain resilience and disruption

PurposeThe study of supply chain disruption (SCD) and supply chain resilience (SCR) remains to be studied deeply in the field of business management. The purpose of this paper is to showcase a framework of SCR strategies to reduce the adverse effects of SCD using systematic literature review and data visualization.Design/methodology/approachUsing a systematic literature review approach, the paper explores the concepts of supply chain disruption and supply chain resilience. Through rigorous systematic screening, authors studied papers on both the concepts and have proposed a framework for the same. The authors also have used data visualization and network diagram approaches for better understanding of the topic.FindingsThe systematic literature review of both the concepts brings out some exciting results which give a new direction to supply chain field. The outcome of this research also outlines numerous future research direction, which will be useful for the research community.Practical implicationsThe numerous strategies of SCR should be implemented by manufacturing as well as a service organization. The framework reported in this research help academician and practitioners to understand SCR and to easily overcome any level of disruption. Supply chain managers must also formulate strategies accordingly and make plans to continually expand the system.Originality/valueThis research is the first such attempt to showcase a formal systematic framework and co-occurrence networks as well as overlay networks of SCR and SCD.

Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research

PurposeThe study identifies nine important research areas and critically maps the structural relationships among supply chain resilience (SCRES) dimensions, namely, vulnerabilities, capabilities, strategies and performance metrics. The analysis also revealed various influential authors, journals, institutions and trending articles, across SCRES literature.Design/methodology/approachThis study performs a bibliometric analysis of 771 articles published over the 32 years from 1988 to 2020, and network analysis in combination with content analysis of 90 most cited articles published in research fronts of SCRES.FindingsThe results demonstrate the underlying research areas within the SCRES, which are clustered into nine research themes: (1) conceptual development of SCRES, (2) recent developments of designing resilient supply chain (SC) networks, (3) focus on identifying drivers of SC vulnerability and risks, (4) impact of risks on network resilience, (5) risk assessment to avoid breakdowns/disruptions, (6) measuring resilience approaches/drivers to improve SC performance, (7) building resilient capabilities by integrating other SC dimensions, (8) quantification of SC network and (9) emphasis on developing robustness in SC networks.Practical implicationsThis research offers implications for classifying the works in literature based on bibliometric information and network analysis techniques. This can help researchers and practitioners to understand the prominent areas in SCRES and provide guidelines for future research in this area.Originality/valueThis study provides an overview of the evolution of SCRES over time in the domain of supply chain management and also outlines a future research agenda claimed by the trending articles to encourage further investigations in the field of SCRES.

Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience

Purpose – This paper provides a robust and structured literature review on supply chain resilience (SCRES), the supply chain’s ability to be prepared for unexpected risk events, responding and recovering quickly to potential disruptions to return to its original situation or grow by moving to a new, more desirable state. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the extant research through focussed questions and provide an insightful framework with propositions to guide further publications and identify future research needs. Design/methodology/approach – The findings underlie a systematic literature review methodology requiring a robust method of literature analysis. The sand cone model is adopted to develop a comprehensive SCRES framework. Findings – The literature review reveals a strong need for an overarching SCRES definition and a clear terminology for its building elements. It indicates that most research has been qualitative and lacks in assessing and measuring SCRES performance. Originality/value – This paper contributes a structured overview of 67 peer-reviewed articles from 2003 to 2013 on an emerging area of supply chain research. The review formulates an overarching definition of SCRES, groups and synthesizes the various SCRES elements into proactive and reactive strategies for the ex-ante/ex-post disruption stage and illustrates SCRES measurement through performance metrics. It provides a comprehensive SCRES framework with propositions and indicates gaps in the literature to target for further development.

Supply chain resilience and key performance indicators: a systematic literature review

A systematic literature review of supply chain resilience in small–medium enterprises (smes): a call for further research, a systematic literature review of the agro-food supply chain: challenges, network design, and performance measurement perspectives, analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the concept of supply chain resilience (SCRES) within a concept mapping framework to seek conceptual clarity, with an emphasis on SCRES definitions, essential elements and managerial practices. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was conducted of 103 peer-reviewed journal articles from the year 2000 to 2015, with the aim of answering a focus review question. Findings Through analysis and synthesis of the literature, the study revealed three major constructs used to define SCRES: phases of resilience, resilience strategies and the capabilities needed to be resilient. Emerging from the capabilities construct are five core SCRES capabilities: the ability to anticipate, to adapt, to respond, to recover and to learn. Also, given the need to consolidate the various constructs of SCRES, the study identified 13 essential elements and 84 managerial practices that support firms to achieve the five capabilities, which are then linked to SCRES strategies and phases to establish the connections that provide an integrated view of the concept. Research limitations/implications The explorative nature of this study and the role of the concept mapping framework, which does not empirically test the relationships in the model, are considered as limitations, to be addressed by the authors in future research. Originality/value The originality of this paper lies in the classification of different features of SCRES through a comprehensive concept mapping framework that establishes relationships and interactions between them. This study, therefore, lays a foundation for testing these connections in future empirical studies. The paper brings together fragmented literature from multiple studies to create a solid body of knowledge that addresses the need for conceptual clarity in SCRES literature.

Export Citation Format

Share document.

IMAGES

  1. supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological

    supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological framework

  2. supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological

    supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological framework

  3. supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological

    supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological framework

  4. supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological

    supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological framework

  5. supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological

    supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological framework

  6. (PDF) Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A

    supply chain resilience a systematic literature review and typological framework

COMMENTS

  1. Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological

    The purpose of this paper is to present a focused review of the SCRES literature by investigating supply chain (SC) capabilities, their relationship to SCRES outcomes and the underpinning theoretical mechanisms of this relationship. Design/methodology/approach

  2. Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological

    The purpose of this paper is to present a focused review of the SCRES literature by investigating supply chain (SC) capabilities, their relationship to SCRES outcomes and the underpinning...

  3. Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological

    The purpose of this paper is to present a focused review of the SCRES literature by investigating supply chain (SC) capabilities, their relationship to SCRES outcomes and the underpinning theoretical mechanisms of this relationship.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses the systematic literature review approach to examine 383 articles publish...

  4. Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological

    The main purpose of this paper is to present what the Industry 5.0 phenomenon means in the supply chain context. A systematic literature review method was used to get evidence from the current knowledge linked to this theme. The results have evidenced a strong gap related to Industry 5.0 approaches for the supply chain field.

  5. Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future

    Supply Chain Resilience Research Areas Future Research Agenda And Performance PurposeThe study identifies nine important research areas and critically maps the structural relationships among supply chain resilience (SCRES) dimensions, namely, vulnerabilities, capabilities, strategies and performance metrics.

  6. Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future

    The study identifies nine important research areas and critically maps the structural relationships among supply chain resilience (SCRES) dimensions, namely, vulnerabilities, capabilities, strategies and performance metrics.

  7. Supply Chain Resilience Framework

    1 Introduction Various definitions of resilience and supply chain resilience constructs exist (see Chap. 1 ). This chapter aims to introduce an overarching supply chain resilience typology based on the literature review from Chap. 2, industry feedback, and Kochan and Nowicki ( 2018 ).

  8. Supply chain resilience initiatives and strategies: A systematic review

    Supply chain resilience (SCRES) is an emerging research area, which plays a crucial role in protecting supply chains (SCs) against small- to large-scale disruptions. Over the past few years, many researchers have focused on developing SCRES strategies that have significantly contributed to mitigating SC disruptions.

  9. PDF Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply chain resilience: A Systematic

    Supply chain resilience as an area of management research, started with an exploratory study of Supply Chain Vulnerability by the Centre for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, undertaken in 2001 on behalf of the UK government's Department for Transport, Department of Trade and Industry (DTi) and The Home Office.

  10. Insights from systematic literature review of supply chain resilience

    The purpose of this paper is to showcase a framework of SCR strategies to reduce the adverse effects of SCD using systematic literature review and data visualization.,Using a systematic literature review approach, the paper explores the concepts of supply chain disruption and supply chain resilience. Through rigorous systematic screening ...

  11. Supply chain resilience initiatives and strategies: A systematic review

    Kochan and Nowicki, 2018 Kochan C.G., Nowicki D.R., Supply chain resilience: A systematic literature review and typological framework, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 48 (2018) 842 - 865, 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0099. Google Scholar

  12. Supply Chain Resilience: Definitions and quantitative modelling

    What challenges still lie for research on resilience in supply chain and which future directions should be taken? 4. Previous literature reviews. The scientific publications here analysed and studied in detail are the result of a search performed on the Web of Science database under the terms "supply chain" AND resilience AND review. An ...

  13. Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological

    The purpose of this paper is to present a focused review of the SCRES literature by investigating supply chain (SC) capabilities, their relationship to SCRES outcomes and the underpinning theoretical mechanisms of this relationship.

  14. Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological

    The purpose of this paper is to present a focused review of the SCRES literature by investigating supply chain (SC) capabilities, their relationship to SCRES outcomes and the underpinning theoretical mechanisms of this relationship.

  15. Resilient supply chain network design: a systematic literature review

    In the wake of disruptions caused by COVID-19, natural disasters, Brexit, and the US-China trade war, supply chain resilience has become more important than ever. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of recent literature on resilient supply chain network design (RSCND). The focus was on studies that used a quantitative approach.

  16. Supply Chain Resilience research trends: a literature overview

    Abstract: Supply Chain Resilience has been broadly studied during the last decades, especially within the academic community. Therefore, the present research article aims to provide a broad view of the scientific literature about Resilience within Supply Chain research. First, a trend analysis of these topics research and publications is presented.

  17. Analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a

    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the concept of supply chain resilience (SCRES) within a concept mapping framework to seek conceptual clarity, with an emphasis on SCRES definitions, essential elements and managerial practices.

  18. Managing supply chain resilience in the era of VUCA

    Kochan C G, Nowicki D R. Supply chain resilience: A systematic literature review and typological framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2018; 48 (8):842-865. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0099. [Google Scholar] Lee H L. The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review. 2004; 82 (10):102-112.

  19. Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future

    DOI: 10.1108/ijlm-03-2021-0169 Corpus ID: 260883572; Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research @article{Shishodia2021SupplyCR, title={Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research}, author={Anjali Shishodia and Rohit Sharma and Raj Rajesh and Ziaul Haque Munim}, journal={The International Journal of Logistics Management}, year ...

  20. Towards a relational framework for supply chain resilience

    Increases in disruptions coupled with enhanced competition have led firms to develop capabilities to sustain performance and enable them to gain competitive advantage. This has underscored the value of supply chain resilience. Supply chain is a network of multiple firms involved in an exchange relationship; hence, developing effective supply chain resilience requires stronger relationship and ...

  21. A Systematic Literature Review of Supply Chain Resilience in Small

    Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological framework International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2017-0099

  22. Sustainable Supply Chain Practices in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Case

    Sustainability reporting within the oil and gas (O&G) industry started back in the 1990s and has improved longitudinally since then. However, when reporting their sustainability-related practices and initiatives, O&G companies seldomly mention the term green supply chain management (GSCM). The study aims to investigate the development of GSCM practices in the O&G sector and to categorize how ...

  23. Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological

    Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological framework https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2017-0099 · Journal: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2018, № 8, p. 842-865 Publisher: Emerald Authors: Cigdem Gonul Kochan, David R. Nowicki Abstract

  24. A systematic literature review of the capabilities and performance

    Improving supply chain resilience through industry 4.0: a systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic Computers & Industrial Engineering 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452 2021 pp. 107452 Author (s): Alexander Spieske Hendrik Birkel Keyword (s): Supply Chain Literature Review Systematic Literature Review