• Bipolar Disorder
  • Therapy Center
  • When To See a Therapist
  • Types of Therapy
  • Best Online Therapy
  • Best Couples Therapy
  • Best Family Therapy
  • Managing Stress
  • Sleep and Dreaming
  • Understanding Emotions
  • Self-Improvement
  • Healthy Relationships
  • Student Resources
  • Personality Types
  • Verywell Mind Insights
  • 2023 Verywell Mind 25
  • Mental Health in the Classroom
  • Editorial Process
  • Meet Our Review Board
  • Crisis Support

What Is Problem-Solving Therapy?

Arlin Cuncic, MA, is the author of "Therapy in Focus: What to Expect from CBT for Social Anxiety Disorder" and "7 Weeks to Reduce Anxiety." She has a Master's degree in psychology.

the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

Daniel B. Block, MD, is an award-winning, board-certified psychiatrist who operates a private practice in Pennsylvania.

the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

Verywell / Madelyn Goodnight

Problem-Solving Therapy Techniques

How effective is problem-solving therapy, things to consider, how to get started.

Problem-solving therapy is a brief intervention that provides people with the tools they need to identify and solve problems that arise from big and small life stressors. It aims to improve your overall quality of life and reduce the negative impact of psychological and physical illness.

Problem-solving therapy can be used to treat depression , among other conditions. It can be administered by a doctor or mental health professional and may be combined with other treatment approaches.

At a Glance

Problem-solving therapy is a short-term treatment used to help people who are experiencing depression, stress, PTSD, self-harm, suicidal ideation, and other mental health problems develop the tools they need to deal with challenges. This approach teaches people to identify problems, generate solutions, and implement those solutions. Let's take a closer look at how problem-solving therapy can help people be more resilient and adaptive in the face of stress.

Problem-solving therapy is based on a model that takes into account the importance of real-life problem-solving. In other words, the key to managing the impact of stressful life events is to know how to address issues as they arise. Problem-solving therapy is very practical in its approach and is only concerned with the present, rather than delving into your past.

This form of therapy can take place one-on-one or in a group format and may be offered in person or online via telehealth . Sessions can be anywhere from 30 minutes to two hours long. 

Key Components

There are two major components that make up the problem-solving therapy framework:

  • Applying a positive problem-solving orientation to your life
  • Using problem-solving skills

A positive problem-solving orientation means viewing things in an optimistic light, embracing self-efficacy , and accepting the idea that problems are a normal part of life. Problem-solving skills are behaviors that you can rely on to help you navigate conflict, even during times of stress. This includes skills like:

  • Knowing how to identify a problem
  • Defining the problem in a helpful way
  • Trying to understand the problem more deeply
  • Setting goals related to the problem
  • Generating alternative, creative solutions to the problem
  • Choosing the best course of action
  • Implementing the choice you have made
  • Evaluating the outcome to determine next steps

Problem-solving therapy is all about training you to become adaptive in your life so that you will start to see problems as challenges to be solved instead of insurmountable obstacles. It also means that you will recognize the action that is required to engage in effective problem-solving techniques.

Planful Problem-Solving

One problem-solving technique, called planful problem-solving, involves following a series of steps to fix issues in a healthy, constructive way:

  • Problem definition and formulation : This step involves identifying the real-life problem that needs to be solved and formulating it in a way that allows you to generate potential solutions.
  • Generation of alternative solutions : This stage involves coming up with various potential solutions to the problem at hand. The goal in this step is to brainstorm options to creatively address the life stressor in ways that you may not have previously considered.
  • Decision-making strategies : This stage involves discussing different strategies for making decisions as well as identifying obstacles that may get in the way of solving the problem at hand.
  • Solution implementation and verification : This stage involves implementing a chosen solution and then verifying whether it was effective in addressing the problem.

Other Techniques

Other techniques your therapist may go over include:

  • Problem-solving multitasking , which helps you learn to think clearly and solve problems effectively even during times of stress
  • Stop, slow down, think, and act (SSTA) , which is meant to encourage you to become more emotionally mindful when faced with conflict
  • Healthy thinking and imagery , which teaches you how to embrace more positive self-talk while problem-solving

What Problem-Solving Therapy Can Help With

Problem-solving therapy addresses life stress issues and focuses on helping you find solutions to concrete issues. This approach can be applied to problems associated with various psychological and physiological symptoms.

Mental Health Issues

Problem-solving therapy may help address mental health issues, like:

  • Chronic stress due to accumulating minor issues
  • Complications associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI)
  • Emotional distress
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
  • Problems associated with a chronic disease like cancer, heart disease, or diabetes
  • Self-harm and feelings of hopelessness
  • Substance use
  • Suicidal ideation

Specific Life Challenges

This form of therapy is also helpful for dealing with specific life problems, such as:

  • Death of a loved one
  • Dissatisfaction at work
  • Everyday life stressors
  • Family problems
  • Financial difficulties
  • Relationship conflicts

Your doctor or mental healthcare professional will be able to advise whether problem-solving therapy could be helpful for your particular issue. In general, if you are struggling with specific, concrete problems that you are having trouble finding solutions for, problem-solving therapy could be helpful for you.

Benefits of Problem-Solving Therapy

The skills learned in problem-solving therapy can be helpful for managing all areas of your life. These can include:

  • Being able to identify which stressors trigger your negative emotions (e.g., sadness, anger)
  • Confidence that you can handle problems that you face
  • Having a systematic approach on how to deal with life's problems
  • Having a toolbox of strategies to solve the issues you face
  • Increased confidence to find creative solutions
  • Knowing how to identify which barriers will impede your progress
  • Knowing how to manage emotions when they arise
  • Reduced avoidance and increased action-taking
  • The ability to accept life problems that can't be solved
  • The ability to make effective decisions
  • The development of patience (realizing that not all problems have a "quick fix")

Problem-solving therapy can help people feel more empowered to deal with the problems they face in their lives. Rather than feeling overwhelmed when stressors begin to take a toll, this therapy introduces new coping skills that can boost self-efficacy and resilience .

Other Types of Therapy

Other similar types of therapy include cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) . While these therapies work to change thinking and behaviors, they work a bit differently. Both CBT and SFBT are less structured than problem-solving therapy and may focus on broader issues. CBT focuses on identifying and changing maladaptive thoughts, and SFBT works to help people look for solutions and build self-efficacy based on strengths.

This form of therapy was initially developed to help people combat stress through effective problem-solving, and it was later adapted to address clinical depression specifically. Today, much of the research on problem-solving therapy deals with its effectiveness in treating depression.

Problem-solving therapy has been shown to help depression in: 

  • Older adults
  • People coping with serious illnesses like cancer

Problem-solving therapy also appears to be effective as a brief treatment for depression, offering benefits in as little as six to eight sessions with a therapist or another healthcare professional. This may make it a good option for someone unable to commit to a lengthier treatment for depression.

Problem-solving therapy is not a good fit for everyone. It may not be effective at addressing issues that don't have clear solutions, like seeking meaning or purpose in life. Problem-solving therapy is also intended to treat specific problems, not general habits or thought patterns .

In general, it's also important to remember that problem-solving therapy is not a primary treatment for mental disorders. If you are living with the symptoms of a serious mental illness such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia , you may need additional treatment with evidence-based approaches for your particular concern.

Problem-solving therapy is best aimed at someone who has a mental or physical issue that is being treated separately, but who also has life issues that go along with that problem that has yet to be addressed.

For example, it could help if you can't clean your house or pay your bills because of your depression, or if a cancer diagnosis is interfering with your quality of life.

Your doctor may be able to recommend therapists in your area who utilize this approach, or they may offer it themselves as part of their practice. You can also search for a problem-solving therapist with help from the American Psychological Association’s (APA) Society of Clinical Psychology .

If receiving problem-solving therapy from a doctor or mental healthcare professional is not an option for you, you could also consider implementing it as a self-help strategy using a workbook designed to help you learn problem-solving skills on your own.

During your first session, your therapist may spend some time explaining their process and approach. They may ask you to identify the problem you’re currently facing, and they’ll likely discuss your goals for therapy .

Keep In Mind

Problem-solving therapy may be a short-term intervention that's focused on solving a specific issue in your life. If you need further help with something more pervasive, it can also become a longer-term treatment option.

Get Help Now

We've tried, tested, and written unbiased reviews of the best online therapy programs including Talkspace, BetterHelp, and ReGain. Find out which option is the best for you.

Shang P, Cao X, You S, Feng X, Li N, Jia Y. Problem-solving therapy for major depressive disorders in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials .  Aging Clin Exp Res . 2021;33(6):1465-1475. doi:10.1007/s40520-020-01672-3

Cuijpers P, Wit L de, Kleiboer A, Karyotaki E, Ebert DD. Problem-solving therapy for adult depression: An updated meta-analysis . Eur Psychiatry . 2018;48(1):27-37. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.11.006

Nezu AM, Nezu CM, D'Zurilla TJ. Problem-Solving Therapy: A Treatment Manual . New York; 2013. doi:10.1891/9780826109415.0001

Owens D, Wright-Hughes A, Graham L, et al. Problem-solving therapy rather than treatment as usual for adults after self-harm: a pragmatic, feasibility, randomised controlled trial (the MIDSHIPS trial) .  Pilot Feasibility Stud . 2020;6:119. doi:10.1186/s40814-020-00668-0

Sorsdahl K, Stein DJ, Corrigall J, et al. The efficacy of a blended motivational interviewing and problem solving therapy intervention to reduce substance use among patients presenting for emergency services in South Africa: A randomized controlled trial . Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy . 2015;10(1):46. doi:doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0042-1

Margolis SA, Osborne P, Gonzalez JS. Problem solving . In: Gellman MD, ed. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine . Springer International Publishing; 2020:1745-1747. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39903-0_208

Kirkham JG, Choi N, Seitz DP. Meta-analysis of problem solving therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder in older adults . Int J Geriatr Psychiatry . 2016;31(5):526-535. doi:10.1002/gps.4358

Garand L, Rinaldo DE, Alberth MM, et al. Effects of problem solving therapy on mental health outcomes in family caregivers of persons with a new diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or early dementia: A randomized controlled trial . Am J Geriatr Psychiatry . 2014;22(8):771-781. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2013.07.007

Noyes K, Zapf AL, Depner RM, et al. Problem-solving skills training in adult cancer survivors: Bright IDEAS-AC pilot study .  Cancer Treat Res Commun . 2022;31:100552. doi:10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100552

Albert SM, King J, Anderson S, et al. Depression agency-based collaborative: effect of problem-solving therapy on risk of common mental disorders in older adults with home care needs . The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry . 2019;27(6):619-624. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2019.01.002

By Arlin Cuncic, MA Arlin Cuncic, MA, is the author of "Therapy in Focus: What to Expect from CBT for Social Anxiety Disorder" and "7 Weeks to Reduce Anxiety." She has a Master's degree in psychology.

10 Best Problem-Solving Therapy Worksheets & Activities

Problem solving therapy

Cognitive science tells us that we regularly face not only well-defined problems but, importantly, many that are ill defined (Eysenck & Keane, 2015).

Sometimes, we find ourselves unable to overcome our daily problems or the inevitable (though hopefully infrequent) life traumas we face.

Problem-Solving Therapy aims to reduce the incidence and impact of mental health disorders and improve wellbeing by helping clients face life’s difficulties (Dobson, 2011).

This article introduces Problem-Solving Therapy and offers techniques, activities, and worksheets that mental health professionals can use with clients.

Before you continue, we thought you might like to download our three Positive Psychology Exercises for free . These science-based exercises explore fundamental aspects of positive psychology, including strengths, values, and self-compassion, and will give you the tools to enhance the wellbeing of your clients, students, or employees.

This Article Contains:

What is problem-solving therapy, 14 steps for problem-solving therapy, 3 best interventions and techniques, 7 activities and worksheets for your session, fascinating books on the topic, resources from positivepsychology.com, a take-home message.

Problem-Solving Therapy assumes that mental disorders arise in response to ineffective or maladaptive coping. By adopting a more realistic and optimistic view of coping, individuals can understand the role of emotions and develop actions to reduce distress and maintain mental wellbeing (Nezu & Nezu, 2009).

“Problem-solving therapy (PST) is a psychosocial intervention, generally considered to be under a cognitive-behavioral umbrella” (Nezu, Nezu, & D’Zurilla, 2013, p. ix). It aims to encourage the client to cope better with day-to-day problems and traumatic events and reduce their impact on mental and physical wellbeing.

Clinical research, counseling, and health psychology have shown PST to be highly effective in clients of all ages, ranging from children to the elderly, across multiple clinical settings, including schizophrenia, stress, and anxiety disorders (Dobson, 2011).

Can it help with depression?

PST appears particularly helpful in treating clients with depression. A recent analysis of 30 studies found that PST was an effective treatment with a similar degree of success as other successful therapies targeting depression (Cuijpers, Wit, Kleiboer, Karyotaki, & Ebert, 2020).

Other studies confirm the value of PST and its effectiveness at treating depression in multiple age groups and its capacity to combine with other therapies, including drug treatments (Dobson, 2011).

The major concepts

Effective coping varies depending on the situation, and treatment typically focuses on improving the environment and reducing emotional distress (Dobson, 2011).

PST is based on two overlapping models:

Social problem-solving model

This model focuses on solving the problem “as it occurs in the natural social environment,” combined with a general coping strategy and a method of self-control (Dobson, 2011, p. 198).

The model includes three central concepts:

  • Social problem-solving
  • The problem
  • The solution

The model is a “self-directed cognitive-behavioral process by which an individual, couple, or group attempts to identify or discover effective solutions for specific problems encountered in everyday living” (Dobson, 2011, p. 199).

Relational problem-solving model

The theory of PST is underpinned by a relational problem-solving model, whereby stress is viewed in terms of the relationships between three factors:

  • Stressful life events
  • Emotional distress and wellbeing
  • Problem-solving coping

Therefore, when a significant adverse life event occurs, it may require “sweeping readjustments in a person’s life” (Dobson, 2011, p. 202).

the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

  • Enhance positive problem orientation
  • Decrease negative orientation
  • Foster ability to apply rational problem-solving skills
  • Reduce the tendency to avoid problem-solving
  • Minimize the tendency to be careless and impulsive

D’Zurilla’s and Nezu’s model includes (modified from Dobson, 2011):

  • Initial structuring Establish a positive therapeutic relationship that encourages optimism and explains the PST approach.
  • Assessment Formally and informally assess areas of stress in the client’s life and their problem-solving strengths and weaknesses.
  • Obstacles to effective problem-solving Explore typically human challenges to problem-solving, such as multitasking and the negative impact of stress. Introduce tools that can help, such as making lists, visualization, and breaking complex problems down.
  • Problem orientation – fostering self-efficacy Introduce the importance of a positive problem orientation, adopting tools, such as visualization, to promote self-efficacy.
  • Problem orientation – recognizing problems Help clients recognize issues as they occur and use problem checklists to ‘normalize’ the experience.
  • Problem orientation – seeing problems as challenges Encourage clients to break free of harmful and restricted ways of thinking while learning how to argue from another point of view.
  • Problem orientation – use and control emotions Help clients understand the role of emotions in problem-solving, including using feelings to inform the process and managing disruptive emotions (such as cognitive reframing and relaxation exercises).
  • Problem orientation – stop and think Teach clients how to reduce impulsive and avoidance tendencies (visualizing a stop sign or traffic light).
  • Problem definition and formulation Encourage an understanding of the nature of problems and set realistic goals and objectives.
  • Generation of alternatives Work with clients to help them recognize the wide range of potential solutions to each problem (for example, brainstorming).
  • Decision-making Encourage better decision-making through an improved understanding of the consequences of decisions and the value and likelihood of different outcomes.
  • Solution implementation and verification Foster the client’s ability to carry out a solution plan, monitor its outcome, evaluate its effectiveness, and use self-reinforcement to increase the chance of success.
  • Guided practice Encourage the application of problem-solving skills across multiple domains and future stressful problems.
  • Rapid problem-solving Teach clients how to apply problem-solving questions and guidelines quickly in any given situation.

Success in PST depends on the effectiveness of its implementation; using the right approach is crucial (Dobson, 2011).

Problem-solving therapy – Baycrest

The following interventions and techniques are helpful when implementing more effective problem-solving approaches in client’s lives.

First, it is essential to consider if PST is the best approach for the client, based on the problems they present.

Is PPT appropriate?

It is vital to consider whether PST is appropriate for the client’s situation. Therapists new to the approach may require additional guidance (Nezu et al., 2013).

Therapists should consider the following questions before beginning PST with a client (modified from Nezu et al., 2013):

  • Has PST proven effective in the past for the problem? For example, research has shown success with depression, generalized anxiety, back pain, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, and supporting caregivers (Nezu et al., 2013).
  • Is PST acceptable to the client?
  • Is the individual experiencing a significant mental or physical health problem?

All affirmative answers suggest that PST would be a helpful technique to apply in this instance.

Five problem-solving steps

The following five steps are valuable when working with clients to help them cope with and manage their environment (modified from Dobson, 2011).

Ask the client to consider the following points (forming the acronym ADAPT) when confronted by a problem:

  • Attitude Aim to adopt a positive, optimistic attitude to the problem and problem-solving process.
  • Define Obtain all required facts and details of potential obstacles to define the problem.
  • Alternatives Identify various alternative solutions and actions to overcome the obstacle and achieve the problem-solving goal.
  • Predict Predict each alternative’s positive and negative outcomes and choose the one most likely to achieve the goal and maximize the benefits.
  • Try out Once selected, try out the solution and monitor its effectiveness while engaging in self-reinforcement.

If the client is not satisfied with their solution, they can return to step ‘A’ and find a more appropriate solution.

Positive self-statements

When dealing with clients facing negative self-beliefs, it can be helpful for them to use positive self-statements.

Use the following (or add new) self-statements to replace harmful, negative thinking (modified from Dobson, 2011):

  • I can solve this problem; I’ve tackled similar ones before.
  • I can cope with this.
  • I just need to take a breath and relax.
  • Once I start, it will be easier.
  • It’s okay to look out for myself.
  • I can get help if needed.
  • Other people feel the same way I do.
  • I’ll take one piece of the problem at a time.
  • I can keep my fears in check.
  • I don’t need to please everyone.

Worksheets for problem solving therapy

5 Worksheets and workbooks

Problem-solving self-monitoring form.

Answering the questions in the Problem-Solving Self-Monitoring Form provides the therapist with necessary information regarding the client’s overall and specific problem-solving approaches and reactions (Dobson, 2011).

Ask the client to complete the following:

  • Describe the problem you are facing.
  • What is your goal?
  • What have you tried so far to solve the problem?
  • What was the outcome?

Reactions to Stress

It can be helpful for the client to recognize their own experiences of stress. Do they react angrily, withdraw, or give up (Dobson, 2011)?

The Reactions to Stress worksheet can be given to the client as homework to capture stressful events and their reactions. By recording how they felt, behaved, and thought, they can recognize repeating patterns.

What Are Your Unique Triggers?

Helping clients capture triggers for their stressful reactions can encourage emotional regulation.

When clients can identify triggers that may lead to a negative response, they can stop the experience or slow down their emotional reaction (Dobson, 2011).

The What Are Your Unique Triggers ? worksheet helps the client identify their triggers (e.g., conflict, relationships, physical environment, etc.).

Problem-Solving worksheet

Imagining an existing or potential problem and working through how to resolve it can be a powerful exercise for the client.

Use the Problem-Solving worksheet to state a problem and goal and consider the obstacles in the way. Then explore options for achieving the goal, along with their pros and cons, to assess the best action plan.

Getting the Facts

Clients can become better equipped to tackle problems and choose the right course of action by recognizing facts versus assumptions and gathering all the necessary information (Dobson, 2011).

Use the Getting the Facts worksheet to answer the following questions clearly and unambiguously:

  • Who is involved?
  • What did or did not happen, and how did it bother you?
  • Where did it happen?
  • When did it happen?
  • Why did it happen?
  • How did you respond?

2 Helpful Group Activities

While therapists can use the worksheets above in group situations, the following two interventions work particularly well with more than one person.

Generating Alternative Solutions and Better Decision-Making

A group setting can provide an ideal opportunity to share a problem and identify potential solutions arising from multiple perspectives.

Use the Generating Alternative Solutions and Better Decision-Making worksheet and ask the client to explain the situation or problem to the group and the obstacles in the way.

Once the approaches are captured and reviewed, the individual can share their decision-making process with the group if they want further feedback.

Visualization

Visualization can be performed with individuals or in a group setting to help clients solve problems in multiple ways, including (Dobson, 2011):

  • Clarifying the problem by looking at it from multiple perspectives
  • Rehearsing a solution in the mind to improve and get more practice
  • Visualizing a ‘safe place’ for relaxation, slowing down, and stress management

Guided imagery is particularly valuable for encouraging the group to take a ‘mental vacation’ and let go of stress.

Ask the group to begin with slow, deep breathing that fills the entire diaphragm. Then ask them to visualize a favorite scene (real or imagined) that makes them feel relaxed, perhaps beside a gently flowing river, a summer meadow, or at the beach.

The more the senses are engaged, the more real the experience. Ask the group to think about what they can hear, see, touch, smell, and even taste.

Encourage them to experience the situation as fully as possible, immersing themselves and enjoying their place of safety.

Such feelings of relaxation may be able to help clients fall asleep, relieve stress, and become more ready to solve problems.

We have included three of our favorite books on the subject of Problem-Solving Therapy below.

1. Problem-Solving Therapy: A Treatment Manual – Arthur Nezu, Christine Maguth Nezu, and Thomas D’Zurilla

Problem-Solving Therapy

This is an incredibly valuable book for anyone wishing to understand the principles and practice behind PST.

Written by the co-developers of PST, the manual provides powerful toolkits to overcome cognitive overload, emotional dysregulation, and the barriers to practical problem-solving.

Find the book on Amazon .

2. Emotion-Centered Problem-Solving Therapy: Treatment Guidelines – Arthur Nezu and Christine Maguth Nezu

Emotion-Centered Problem-Solving Therapy

Another, more recent, book from the creators of PST, this text includes important advances in neuroscience underpinning the role of emotion in behavioral treatment.

Along with clinical examples, the book also includes crucial toolkits that form part of a stepped model for the application of PST.

3. Handbook of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies – Keith Dobson and David Dozois

Handbook of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies

This is the fourth edition of a hugely popular guide to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies and includes a valuable and insightful section on Problem-Solving Therapy.

This is an important book for students and more experienced therapists wishing to form a high-level and in-depth understanding of the tools and techniques available to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapists.

For even more tools to help strengthen your clients’ problem-solving skills, check out the following free worksheets from our blog.

  • Case Formulation Worksheet This worksheet presents a four-step framework to help therapists and their clients come to a shared understanding of the client’s presenting problem.
  • Understanding Your Default Problem-Solving Approach This worksheet poses a series of questions helping clients reflect on their typical cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to problems.
  • Social Problem Solving: Step by Step This worksheet presents a streamlined template to help clients define a problem, generate possible courses of action, and evaluate the effectiveness of an implemented solution.
  • 17 Positive Psychology Exercises If you’re looking for more science-based ways to help others enhance their wellbeing, check out this signature collection of 17 validated positive psychology tools for practitioners . Use them to help others flourish and thrive.

While we are born problem-solvers, facing an incredibly diverse set of challenges daily, we sometimes need support.

Problem-Solving Therapy aims to reduce stress and associated mental health disorders and improve wellbeing by improving our ability to cope. PST is valuable in diverse clinical settings, ranging from depression to schizophrenia, with research suggesting it as a highly effective treatment for teaching coping strategies and reducing emotional distress.

Many PST techniques are available to help improve clients’ positive outlook on obstacles while reducing avoidance of problem situations and the tendency to be careless and impulsive.

The PST model typically assesses the client’s strengths, weaknesses, and coping strategies when facing problems before encouraging a healthy experience of and relationship with problem-solving.

Why not use this article to explore the theory behind PST and try out some of our powerful tools and interventions with your clients to help them with their decision-making, coping, and problem-solving?

We hope you enjoyed reading this article. Don’t forget to download our three Positive Psychology Exercises for free .

  • Cuijpers, P., Wit, L., Kleiboer, A., Karyotaki, E., & Ebert, D. (2020). Problem-solving therapy for adult depression: An updated meta-analysis. European P sychiatry ,  48 (1), 27–37.
  • Dobson, K. S. (2011). Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Dobson, K. S., & Dozois, D. J. A. (2021). Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies  (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook . Psychology Press.
  • Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (2009). Problem-solving therapy DVD . Retrieved September 13, 2021, from https://www.apa.org/pubs/videos/4310852
  • Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (2018). Emotion-centered problem-solving therapy: Treatment guidelines. Springer.
  • Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (2013). Problem-solving therapy: A treatment manual . Springer.

' src=

Share this article:

Article feedback

What our readers think.

Saranya

Thanks for your information given, it was helpful for me something new I learned

Let us know your thoughts Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Related articles

Variations of the empty chair

The Empty Chair Technique: How It Can Help Your Clients

Resolving ‘unfinished business’ is often an essential part of counseling. If left unresolved, it can contribute to depression, anxiety, and mental ill-health while damaging existing [...]

the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

29 Best Group Therapy Activities for Supporting Adults

As humans, we are social creatures with personal histories based on the various groups that make up our lives. Childhood begins with a family of [...]

Free Therapy Resources

47 Free Therapy Resources to Help Kick-Start Your New Practice

Setting up a private practice in psychotherapy brings several challenges, including a considerable investment of time and money. You can reduce risks early on by [...]

Read other articles by their category

  • Body & Brain (46)
  • Coaching & Application (56)
  • Compassion (26)
  • Counseling (51)
  • Emotional Intelligence (24)
  • Gratitude (18)
  • Grief & Bereavement (21)
  • Happiness & SWB (40)
  • Meaning & Values (26)
  • Meditation (20)
  • Mindfulness (45)
  • Motivation & Goals (45)
  • Optimism & Mindset (33)
  • Positive CBT (26)
  • Positive Communication (20)
  • Positive Education (46)
  • Positive Emotions (31)
  • Positive Leadership (15)
  • Positive Psychology (33)
  • Positive Workplace (34)
  • Productivity (16)
  • Relationships (45)
  • Resilience & Coping (34)
  • Self Awareness (20)
  • Self Esteem (36)
  • Strengths & Virtues (30)
  • Stress & Burnout Prevention (34)
  • Theory & Books (46)
  • Therapy Exercises (37)
  • Types of Therapy (63)

Advertisement

Advertisement

Increasing Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Conduct Problems in Children and Adolescents: What Can We Learn from Neuroimaging Studies?

  • Open access
  • Published: 08 March 2021
  • Volume 24 , pages 484–499, ( 2021 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

  • Walter Matthys 1 , 2 &
  • Dennis J. L. G. Schutter 3  

15k Accesses

5 Citations

4 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is particularly relevant for children from 7 years on and adolescents with clinical levels of conduct problems. CBT provides these children and adolescents with anger regulation and social problem-solving skills that enable them to behave in more independent and situation appropriate ways. Typically, CBT is combined with another psychological treatment such as behavioral parent training in childhood or an intervention targeting multiple systems in adolescence. The effectiveness of CBT, however, is in the small to medium range. The aim of this review is to describe how the effectiveness of CBT may be improved by paying more attention to a series of psychological functions that have been shown to be impaired in neuroimaging studies: (1) anger recognition, (2) the ability to generate situation appropriate solutions to social problems, (3) reinforcement-based decision making, (4) response inhibition, and (5) affective empathy. It is suggested that children and adolescents first become familiar with these psychological functions during group CBT sessions. In individual sessions in which the parents (and/or child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment) and the child or adolescent participate, parents then learn to elicit, support, and reinforce their child’s use of these psychological functions in everyday life (in vivo practice). In these individual sessions, working on the psychological functions is tailored to the individual child’s characteristic impairments of these functions. CBT therapists may also share crucial social-learning topics with teachers with a view to creating learning opportunities for children and adolescents at school.

Similar content being viewed by others

the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

Improving Our Understanding of Impaired Social Problem-Solving in Children and Adolescents with Conduct Problems: Implications for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Walter Matthys & Dennis J. L. G. Schutter

the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

Cognitive-Behavioral, Rational-Emotive Treatment of Childhood Anger and Conduct Problems

A review of parent training in child interventions: applications to cognitive–behavioral therapy for children with high-functioning autism.

Tyler A. Hassenfeldt, Jill Lorenzi & Angela Scarpa

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

According to the most recent large meta-analysis of psychological therapy for children and adolescents treated for mental health problems in the clinical range the mean post-treatment effect size (ES, Cohen’s d ) for conduct problems is 0.46 (Weisz et al., 2017 ). The effect sizes of several types of psychological therapy for conduct problems, however, differ from each other.

In the meta-analysis by McCart et al. ( 2006 ), the ES of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in children and adolescents with conduct problems is d  = 0.35 while the ES of behavioral parent training is d  = 0.47. According to a more recent meta-analysis of behavioral parent training, the ES for children aged 2–9 years is even larger: d  = 0.69 (Leijten et al., 2019 ). In the meta-analysis by McCart et al., there was a positive relationship between age and ES for CBT: as youth enter more advanced levels of cognitive development, they receive increased benefits from CBT. Yet in the meta-analysis by Armelius and Andreassen ( 2007 ), the ES of CBT in youths aged 12–22 for the treatment of antisocial behavior in residential setting is only d  = 0.25. According to British guidelines, group CBT for children aged 9–14 years with clinical levels of conduct problems is advised based on low-to moderate-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials (National Institute for Health and Clinical Practice (NICE), 2013 , 2017; Pilling et al., 2013 ). Clearly, attempts at increasing effectiveness of CBT as a psychological treatment for conduct problems in middle childhood and adolescence are appropriate.

One way might be to examine neuroimaging studies that investigate biological correlates of psychological functions targeted in CBT. In CBT, children and adolescents learn better ways to manage their anger and solve social problems by increasing emotion-regulation and problem-solving abilities (Lochman et al., 2019 ; Matthys & Lochman, 2017 ). In particular, children and adolescents learn to identify their level of anger as well as to use coping self-statements, distraction techniques, and brief deep-breathing relaxation methods as a means to handle arousal associated with their anger. They also learn and improve to adequately interpret social problems, generate possible solutions, and decide which solution will be implemented. We will currently review functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies examining psychological functions that are targeted in CBT for conduct problems: anger recognition, the ability to generate situation appropriate solutions to social problems, reinforcement-based decision making, response inhibition, and affective empathy. For this, we use meta-analyses, reviews of neuroimaging studies and separate neuroimaging studies, and discuss results in the context of other studies of these five psychological functions. Thus, our non-systematic review of functional neuroimaging studies is motivated by increasing our understanding of psychological abilities that may improve CBT effectiveness. After presentation of the neuroimaging work of each psychological function, we will provide a conclusion as a theoretical statement and working hypothesis about the potential role of the psychological function in the maintenance of conduct problems and finally discuss possible implications for CBT.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

CBT is particularly relevant for children from 7 years on and for adolescents as CBT provides them with anger regulation and social problem-solving skills that enable them to behave in more independent and situation appropriate ways. Anger management and social problem solving are core elements of evidence-based practice for children with conduct problems (Garland et al., 2008 ). Early CBT programs such as the Anger Control Program (Lochman et al., 1981 ) and Problem-Solving Skills Training (Kazdin et al., 1987 ) were developed as sole interventions for children with conduct problems. For example, Problem-Solving Skills Training was offered in cases when working with parents was not a viable option due to severe family dysfunction or parent psychopathology (Kazdin et al., 1987 ).

Over the years, developers of programs have combined CBT with other psychological treatments such as behavioral parent training in childhood or intervention targeting multiple systems in adolescence. Examples of programs for children aged 7–13 years that have been proven to be effective are Problem-Solving Skills Training combined with Parent Management Training (Kazdin et al., 1992 ); the Coping Power program, a more extended and comprehensive version of the Anger Coping program (Lochman et al., 1981 ), consisting of a child component and a parent component (Lochman et al., 2008 ; Wells et al., 2008 ; Van de Wiel et al., 2007 ; Zonnevylle-Bender et al., 2007 ); the Stop Now and Plan program consisting of several components including a child component and a parent component (Augimeri et al., 2007 ; Burke & Loeber, 2015 ). An example of a program developed for adolescents is the Aggression Replacement Training (Goldstein et al., 1998 ; Hornsveld et al., 2015 ) which involves network meetings between parents, teachers, friends, and social workers or other care providers. For adolescents with severe conduct problems interventions that target multiple environmental systems (e.g., family, peers, school) such as Multisystemic Therapy (Henggeler et al., 2009 ; Van der Stouwe et al., 2014 ) have been developed and may also include a CBT component. For more examples of evidence-based programs, see reviews by Kaminski and Claussen ( 2017 ) and McCart and Sheidow ( 2016 ).

Most psychological interventions for conduct problems that have been proven to be effective are based on operant learning principles (e.g., positive reinforcement) and cognitive learning principles (e.g., use of inner speech). In behavioral parent training, children and adolescents acquire appropriate behaviors and learn to refrain from inappropriate behaviors as a result of parents’ or caregivers’ giving positive instructions, praising appropriate behaviors, ignoring minor inappropriate behaviors, and using time-out for severe inappropriate behaviors (Kazdin, 2005 ). Likewise, in CBT, children and adolescents acquire anger management and problem-solving abilities (Lochman et al., 2019 ; Matthys & Lochman, 2017 ). The effectiveness of these social-learning-based behavioral therapies may depend on children’s and adolescents’ impairments in processing of punishment cues, reward cues, and cognitive control (Matthys et al., 2012 , 2013 ).

In the present review, we will focus on conduct problems in the clinical range, either because children and adolescents meet criteria of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) or Conduct Disorder (CD) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fifth edition; DSM-5 , American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ), Oppositional Defiant Disorder or Conduct-Dissocial Disorder according to the International Classification of Diseases (eleventh edition; ICD-11 , World Health Association, 2020 ), or because they show symptoms in the clinical range on a standardized measure of psychopathology. Finding ways to improve the effectiveness of psychological treatment of conduct problems is of utmost importance, especially given the range of short- and long-term negative outcomes of conduct problems in adulthood, including crime, substance use disorders, suicide attempts, low educational achievement, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, manic episode, schizophreniform disorder, eating disorders (Fergusson et al., 2005 ; Kim-Cohen et al., 2003 ), as well as high costs in terms of service utilization across all three domains of criminal justice, health, and social welfare (Rivenbark et al., 2018 ).

Anger Recognition

Emotional dysregulation during anger is an important mechanism driving reactive aggression in children and adolescents (Hubbard et al., 2010 ). Based on clinical work with low-income aggressive children, Lochman et al. ( 1981 ) developed the Anger Control program that incorporated both the self-instruction training methods from Meichenbaum ( 1977 ) and the social problem-solving training methods from Spivack and Shure ( 1974 ). Anger management skills are crucial for children and adolescents with conduct problems in order to handle the surge in anger to a provocation or frustration before they can successfully begin to use problem-solving strategies. Therefore, in the Coping Power program (Lochman et al., 2008 ), anger coping precedes social problem solving. However, a precondition for children and adolescents with conduct problems to learn managing their anger is to become aware and recognize their own anger.

It might be that children and adolescents with conduct problems have difficulties recognizing anger in others and their own anger. These difficulties have been associated with hyporeactivity of the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortex involved in the processing of angry expressions (Blair et al., 1999 ). Male adolescents and young adults with conduct problems displayed abnormally reduced brain responses of the amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and insula when viewing angry versus neutral faces relative to controls (Passamonti et al., 2010 ). Also, female adolescents with conduct problems demonstrated decreased medial orbitofrontal cortex functioning while viewing facial expressions among which anger relative to controls (Fairchild et al., 2014 ). In addition, reduced left anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus responses have been observed in male adolescents with conduct problems and callous-unemotional (CU) traits relative to normal controls when participants were asked to judge their own emotional reactions to fearful and angry expressions of others (Klapwijk et al., 2016 ).

Several neuroimaging studies suggest that children and adolescents with conduct problems have difficulty in recognizing anger in others and their own feelings of anger. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether including anger recognition as a crucial first step in anger management improves anger management abilities and reduces reactive aggression, especially in those children and adolescents with clear difficulties in anger recognition.

In CBT, improving children’s and adolescents’ anger management abilities is an important topic. For example, in the Coping Power program, one session is devoted to identification of physiological cues of anger (e.g., feeling hot, faster heart rate, tightened muscles) and identification of various levels of anger (e.g., irritated, mad, furious) (Lochman et al., 2008 ). One may question whether one session is sufficient for children with conduct problems to recognize their anger in everyday life situations as this seems to be a major problem for them. In Coping Power trials, the effect sizes for proactive aggression have been as much as three times larger than the effect sizes for reactive aggression (Miller et al., 2020 ). From the viewpoint of enhancing the effects of the program by more precisely and intensively targeting the active mechanisms of reactive aggression, developers of Coping Power will start to include mindfulness in the program (Miller et al., 2020 ). But in their motivation the authors do not seem to consider anger recognition problematic for children and adolescents with conduct problems as no reference is made to psychological studies showing that anger recognition may be problematic for children and adolescents with conduct problems.

Male young offenders demonstrate difficulties in recognizing low intensity anger in others (Bowen et al., 2016 ). Likewise, boys and girls with disruptive behavior referred into a crime prevention program were impaired in anger recognition (Hunnikin et al., 2020 ). Anger recognition was disproportionally impaired in boys with early-onset CD (Fairchild et al., 2009 ). Also, both boys and girls with conduct problems compared to controls showed more difficulties in recognizing facial emotions among which anger (Kohls et al., 2020 ). In their study of social information-processing in aggressive and depressed children, Quiggle et al. ( 1992 ) included the emotions (e.g., anger, sadness) when children were read negative stories. Depressed children reported more inner experienced anger than controls, but surprisingly aggressive children did not. Likewise, a study by Van Rest et al. ( 2020 ) in adolescents with conduct problems did not show differences between these adolescents and controls in their anger after viewing videos depicting problem situations in which youths were disadvantaged by accident, while these adolescents generated more aggressive responses and selected more often an aggressive response among various responses shown. Apparently, these studies have been overlooked by researchers involved in CBT but results are in line with the previously discussed neuroimaging studies. How can anger recognition become a topic in CBT?

In CBT, child and parent components often are offered as separate components: therapists work with parents on their parenting skills and with children on their anger management and social problem-solving skills. Here, we propose that parents or foster parents should become actively involved in CBT; this also applies for child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment. For example, parents can observe their child and therapist working on anger recognition, including the recognition of physiological cues which signal that the child is becoming angry. Parents then learn to develop skills in prompting and praising their child’s use of anger recognition in everyday life (in vivo practice, Kazdin et al., 1989 ). For example, they learn to ask questions such as ‘It seems to me that something is bothering you’ or ‘It seems to me that you feel annoyed,’ and ‘Good of you that you recognize this in yourself.’ In our view, anger recognition in everyday life should become a major theme in CBT as it is a precondition for the next steps consisting of using the coping self-statements, distraction techniques, and brief deep-breathing relaxation methods as a means to handle arousal associated with anger by the child or adolescent.

Furthermore, CBT therapists may also want to inform teachers of the child’s or adolescent’s learning processes. The school is an ideal environment for children and adolescents with conduct problems to improve their anger management and social problem-solving skills given the amount of time they spend in school in a wide variety of social contexts. With regard to anger recognition, we assume that a lot of practice is needed for children and adolescents with conduct problems to actually recognize their anger in socially difficult situations. Like the parents, teachers may prompt and praise the child’s use of anger recognition in everyday life. In addition, teachers may warn the child that a difficult situation is coming for him or her. For example, the child quickly becomes angry when he receives a comment about his school work. The anticipation of a difficult situation may help the child to better recognize his anger and use the anger management skills he or she learns in CBT. Other potential difficult situations are when the child is teased by peers or when a peer outperforms in a game (Dodge et al., 1985 ). These are all problematic social situations that will be addressed in the next section.

The Ability to Generate Situation Appropriate Solutions to Social Problems

In everyday life, children continuously face social problems such as how to respond to situations in which the child is being disadvantaged or how to cope with competition (Dodge et al., 1985 ; Matthys et al., 2001 ). To deal with these challenges, children have at their disposal a set of cognitive skills including defining the problem or interpreting the situation, generating possible solutions, and deciding which solution will be implemented (see social information-processing models by Crick & Dodge, 1994 , and by Dodge et al., 1986 ). In social information-processing research emphasis is put on the aggressive children’s interpretation of the situation as being hostile (see meta-analyses by De Castro et al., 2002 , and by Verhoef et al., 2019 ). On the other hand, only few studies have focused on the quantity and the quality of the solutions generated. As for the number of solutions, boys with conduct problems have been found to generate fewer solutions to problems than their peers in situations in which they have to cope with competition (Matthys et al., 1999 ). With respect to the quality of the responses generated, aggressive children have been shown to offer fewer verbal assertive solutions than their peers (Lochman & Lampron, 1986 ). For treatment purposes, the latter finding is highly relevant: do children and adolescents with conduct problems have appropriate responses in their repertoire?

When individuals demonstrate problems with the processing of reward cues, they are less able to make accurate predictions about which kind of behaviors is beneficial for them (Blair, 2010 ). Reduced reward processing can impair social problem solving, in particular the generation of solutions that are beneficial for them, a topic that may have been underestimated in social information-processing research.

When looking at the brain, the amygdala is thought to be implicated in the formation of stimulus-outcome associations based on environmental feedback and closely interacts with the orbitofrontal cortex, which is implicated in the generation of reinforcement-related expectations (Averbeck & Costa, 2017 ; Costa & Averbeck, 2020 ; Rolls, 2004 ). The orbitofrontal cortex and striatum also play a role in error prediction during learning (Hare et al., 2008 ; O’Doherty et al., 2006 ). In a situation where the individual is choosing whether to make a response associated with a particular value, reinforcement expectancy information provided by the striatum on the basis of prior experience is critical (Blair et al., 2018 ). The striatum and anterior cingulate cortex are also important for prediction of error signals (i.e., detecting a discrepancy between the anticipated and actual outcome). Prediction error signals are thought to facilitate reward and punishment-related feedback learning in terms of error minimization routines. In addition, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex represent reinforcement expectancies (Blair et al., 2018 ; Finger et al., 2011 ). Children and adolescents with conduct problems have been found to show reduced responses in the orbitofrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and striatum during both anticipation and response to rewards (Cohn et al., 2015 ; Finger et al., 2011 ; Rubia et al., 2009 ; White et al., 2013 ).

Difficulties in making correct predictions about which behavior in a certain situation is most beneficial can interfere with children’s and adolescents’ ability to generate situation appropriate solutions. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether improving the generation of situation appropriate solutions improves social problem solving and ultimately reduces conduct problems, especially in those children and adolescents who do not show adequate responses in their cognitive repertoire.

In CBT programs, social problem solving is a core theme. Children and adolescents are encouraged to come up with as many solutions as possible which then are categorized into solution types such as help seeking, verbal assertion, compromise, verbal aggression, and physical aggression. One may question whether CBT therapists should work on this with children and adolescents independently of parents and teachers. Children’s learning to generate appropriate solutions is likely to be a slow process, require a lot of practice, and must, therefore also take place in everyday life situations (in vivo practice). The Fast Track study showed that a multiyear preventive intervention offered at schools including the promotion of children’s social-cognitive skills, children’s social skills, and parenting skills, among others, resulted in a decrease of antisocial behavior. This reduction was mediated by its impact on three social-cognitive processes: reducing hostile-attribution biases, increasing the generation of socially competent responses to social problems, and devaluing aggression (Dodge et al., 2013 ). This study not only demonstrates that increasing children’s generation of appropriate responses to social problems is feasible but is also a mechanism of change and as such constitutes an important aspect of cognitive-behavioral-oriented treatment approaches.

In order to strengthen children’s and adolescents’ ability to produce solutions, CBT therapists may teach parents or foster parents how to assist their child to come up with solutions that are beneficial to the child’s well-being (e.g., solutions resulting in a better relationship with parents, siblings, and peers). This also applies for child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment. Parents can ask their child questions about the social problem such as: ‘What can you do about it?’ And, if needed, parents can give suggestions about which behavior can bring benefits to the child or adolescent himself or herself on the short and long term. But children should also experience for themselves that socially appropriate solutions are rewarding, so that they can become part of their cognitive repertoire.

Therefore, in families where coercive interactions prevail over positive interactions between the child or adolescent and his or her parents and siblings, CBT therapists in their work with parents teach them how to elicit appropriate behaviors in their child by giving positive instructions as well as by relabeling problem behavior in its positive opposite and giving this opposite as an instruction (Kazdin, 2005 ). If these appropriate behaviors produce a rewarding effect on the child, these behaviors are more likely to re-occur in comparable situations and consequently have a higher likelihood that they become part of the child’s behavioral repertoire for dealing with social situations effectively. As a result, these solutions are stored in long-term memory and are accessible as a possible response to a social situation (i.e., they become part of their cognitive repertoire). Much repetition is needed here before associations between responses and reward are made due to problems in making these associations. CBT therapists may work with teachers in a similar way.

As a complement, collaborative discussions with parents may teach children how to generate mutually satisfactory solutions. This approach, called Collaborative and Proactive Solutions (previously referred to as Collaborative Problem Solving) (Greene, 1998 ), focuses on helping children and parents learn to proactively and collaboratively solve daily social problems. In a clinical trial in youth with ODD, the Collaborative and Proactive Solutions program was shown to be equivalent to a behavior parent training program (Ollendick et al., 2016 ).

Reinforcement-Based Decision-Making

The final step in social problem solving is deciding which alternative will be selected among the ones that have been generated (Crick & Dodge, 1994 ; Dodge et al., 1986 ), a step that has often not been included in social information-processing studies. As compared to typically developing boys, school-aged boys with conduct problems who were given the opportunity to select a response among a number of options shown in videos, including prosocial responses, more often selected an aggressive response, and less frequently a prosocial response in situations in which they are being disadvantaged (Matthys et al., 1999 ). Likewise, adolescents with conduct problems more often selected an aggressive response among the various response options as compared with their typically developing peers in accidental situations (i.e., situations in which they are being disadvantaged by accident) (Van Rest et al., 2020 ). It is interesting to note that children and adolescents with conduct problems even after an extensive assessment of the social information process in which examples of appropriate responses are shown and numerous questions about the various responses asked, are still inclined to select an aggressive response (Van Rest et al., 2020 ).

The response-decision process is assumed to be affected by outcome expectations and evaluations based on moral values (Crick & Dodge, 1994 ). Children and adolescents with aggressive behavior expect aggressive behavior to lead to favorable outcomes (Fontaine et al., 2002 ; Perry et al., 1986 ). In addition, children with aggressive behavior have been shown to have positive evaluations of aggressive outcomes (Zelli et al., 1999 ). Moreover, a stronger belief that aggressive retaliation is acceptable predicts more future aggressive behavior (Zelli et al., 1999 ).

In neurobiological research, reinforcement-based decision-making studies show that reduced neural responsiveness to reward puts an individual at risk of poor decision making because response choices are less guided by expectations that an action will result in reward relative to punishment (Blair et al., 2018 ). A meta-analysis of whole-brain fMRI studies showed that the most consistent dysfunction in children and adolescents with conduct problems involves the rostro-dorsomedial, fronto-cingulate, and ventral-striatal regions that mediate reward-based decision making (Alegria et al., 2016 ). In addition, anterior insular cortex, dorsomedial frontal cortex, and caudate nucleus of the striatum have been found to be implicated in avoidance-related behavior (Blair et al., 2018 ). Dysfunctions in these regions when making suboptimal choices as a function of expected value have been found in adolescents with conduct problems (White et al., 2014 ) and are correlated to increased risk for antisocial behavior (White et al., 2016 ).

Difficulties in decision making based on uncertainties about reward and punishment outcomes can impede children’s and adolescents’ ability to make decisions about appropriate solutions to social problems. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether improving decision making based on correct expectations will ultimately result in a reduction of conduct problems, especially in those children and adolescents who have difficulties anticipating that an action will result in a reward or punishment.

In CBT, after children and adolescents have come up with solutions, the therapist asks questions about the consequences of these solutions and about possible alternative solutions in view of making the decision of an appropriate response: ‘What do you think will happen if you do or say that? Will that help solve the problem? What is the direct effect for yourself and for the other? And what is the effect in a week or a month? Is that an appropriate thing to do? Are there other ways to solve the problem?’ Whether just discussing these topics in CBT is sufficient to change children’s and adolescent’s decision-making process remains an open question.

Here, we suggest two approaches that may facilitate the learning processes involved in making appropriate decisions in everyday life situations. First, children and adolescents with conduct problems need to actually experience that appropriate behaviors result in positive consequences. Therefore, therapists in their work with parents, foster parents, and child care workers teach them how to elicit and then reinforce appropriate responses in the child or adolescent. Second, therapists teach parents and other adults how they can assist the child or the adolescent in evaluating various responses and selecting the response for enactment that is most appropriate for him or her not only on the short term (e.g., in terms of reaching a goal for the child himself) but also on the long term (e.g., in terms of positive consequences for the relationship with the other person) (in vivo practice). Parents can learn to ask their child questions such as those previously mentioned. Children and adolescents with conduct problems, however, may have difficulty in making appropriate decisions because response choices are less guided by expectations that an action will result in reward relative to punishment. Therapists, therefore, remind parents, foster parents, and child care workers that much repetition is needed to improve the child’s or adolescent’s decision making. Likewise, CBT therapists may assist teachers in implementing this approach that includes both a behavioral and a cognitive component.

Response Inhibition

A precondition for using social problem-solving skills is that the tendency to respond impulsively is suppressed. Children with conduct problems are typically action oriented in their social thinking (Lochman & Lampron, 1986 ; Matthys et al., 1995 ). So becoming aware that they are encountering a social problem and should think before acting can be a difficult step for them to make in everyday life. In other words, response inhibition or inhibitory control of impulses which is one of the executive functions that regulate people’s thinking and behaviors (Diamond, 2013 ; Miyake & Friedman, 2012 ), can be a serious issue for children and adolescents with conduct problems. Impaired response inhibition can prevent them from starting the social problem-solving process and may affect social problem-solving steps such as deciding which response to select among the responses generated (Van Nieuwenhuijzen et al., 2017 ). While impaired response inhibition should not be expected in children and adolescents with conduct problems as impulsivity is a typical characteristic of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and not of ODD or CD, the latter disorders and ADHD often co-occur (Angold et al., 1999 ).

Deficits in response inhibition have not only been found in elementary school children with ADHD, but also in children with conduct problems without comorbid ADHD (Oosterlaan et al., 1998 ). Similarly, impairments in inhibition were observed for both preschool children with ADHD and preschool children with conduct problems with and without ADHD comorbidity relative to typically developing children (Schoemaker et al., 2012 ). In contrast, adolescents with ADHD, conduct problems, and autism spectrum disorder show a high number of failed inhibitions on a Go/NoGo task relative to typically developing children. However, post hoc analyses suggest that ADHD symptoms may be in part driving the increased level of unsuccessfully inhibited no-go trials in the conduct problems group (Leno et al, 2018 ). Even if this would be the case, given the co-occurrence of ADHD symptoms and conduct problems at a greater than random rate (Waschbusch, 2002 ), impaired response inhibition is still relevant for the conduct problems group (see systematic review and meta-analysis by Bonham et al., 2021 ). In addition, when motivational factors such as reward and punishment are included in response inhibition tasks (e.g., the response perseveration task), impairments in these so-called ‘hot executive functions’ seem to be clearly associated with conduct problems (Matthys et al., 1998 , 2004 ), and even more than with ADHD (Van Goozen et al., 2004 ). For reviews of the neuroimaging literature, see Rubia ( 2011 ) and Noordermeer et al. ( 2016 ).

In a review of fMRI studies, Blair et al. ( 2018 ) conclude that studies examining different paradigms involving response inhibition (as a ‘cold executive function’) report no differences in recruitment of regions implicated in response control, including the inferior frontal gyrus, anterior insular cortex, and dorsomedial frontal cortex, between children and adolescents with conduct problems and controls. The authors note that several of these studies excluded youth with conduct problems with comorbid ADHD. A study that did not control for the presence of ADHD showed reduced anterior insular activity on a cognitive interference (Stroop) task. The extent of impairment did not particularly relate to severity of conduct problems but did positively correlate to ADHD symptom severity (Hwang et al., 2016 ). In our opinion, this does not make the finding any less relevant. As ADHD often is associated with conduct problems (Angold et al., 1999 ), impaired response inhibition may be a characteristic of the child or adolescent referred for the treatment of conduct problems. In sum, response inhibition may be impaired in children and adolescents with conduct problems either due to the association with ADHD (symptoms) or to motivational demands (reward and punishment) included.

With regard to social problem solving, impaired response inhibition can prevent children and adolescents with conduct problems from starting the thinking process before acting, especially those with either comorbid ADHD or associated ADHD symptoms. Impaired response inhibition may also affect these children’s and adolescents’ social problem solving such as generating solutions and making decisions. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether enhancing response inhibition through training programs (see further Kofler et al., 2018 , 2020 ) affects social problem solving in everyday life and ultimately results in a reduction of conduct problems, especially in those children and adolescents with either comorbid ADHD or associated ADHD symptoms. Likewise, an efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether enhancing response inhibition by psychostimulants in children and adolescents with conduct problems and ADHD comorbidity affects social problem solving in everyday life and ultimately results in a reduction of conduct problems.

In CBT, thinking prior to acting is a theme. In a study of the child component of Coping Power, effectiveness of group delivery was compared to individual delivery. According to teachers, children with low levels of inhibitory control appeared to profit more from individual delivery of Coping Power than children with high levels of inhibitory control, suggesting that individual delivery offers opportunities for tailoring CBT to children’s individual needs (Lochman et al., 2015 ).

Although thinking prior to acting is addressed by CBT, the issue of starting the thinking process when children and adolescents are facing a social problem in everyday life at home and at school probably may need more attention. We, therefore, suggest that CBT therapists instruct parents, foster parents, child care workers, and teachers to assist the child or adolescent in withstanding his or her impulsive urges by engaging into the thinking process of social problem solving that children and adolescents learn in CBT during daily life (in vivo practice). When children or adolescents ask for help when they face a social problem, parents and teachers assist the child or adolescent if necessary by asking questions like: ‘What is the problem? What are some solutions?’ etc. Likewise, when parents and teachers see the problem arise before their eyes, they can ask those questions. It is, however, complicated when the problem occurs out of sight of adults. It may help to discuss with the child and adolescent in CBT the type of social situation he or she finds particularly difficult to deal with. For example, when the child finds out that he or she has been left out of a group, game, or activity of peers or when a peer performs better than the child in a game (Dodge et al., 1985 ; Matthys et al., 2001 ). When children and adolescents know which social situation is problematic for them, this awareness can help them to engage in the thinking process and ask themselves questions on how to solve the problem.

In line with a conceptual framework for combined neurocognitive and skill-based treatment approaches for youth with ADHD (Chacko et al., 2014 ), we suggest that executive function training programs are included in the treatment of children and adolescents with conduct problems and poor response inhibition associated with ADHD. While training programs targeting working memory and response inhibition have been less successful than initially anticipated, results of recent studies on central executive training targeting working memory, with effects on response inhibition and hyperactivity, are promising (Kofler et al., 2018 , 2020 ). In a review of interventions and approaches for improving executive functions, Diamond and Ling ( 2016 ) suggest that while challenging of executive functions is necessary for improving them, benefits of improving executive functions will be greater if children’s and adolescents’ emotional, social, and physical needs are also addressed. For instance, stress, sadness, loneliness, not enough sleep, and lack of physical activity have a negative impact on executive functioning (Diamond & Ling, 2016 ). Parents can, therefore, create conditions (e.g., healthy life style) for their child to make optimal use of their executive functions among which response inhibition.

Affective Empathy

Empathy is the understanding of another’s emotional state (cognitive empathy) as well as the ability of sharing/feeling another’s emotional state (affective empathy). The cognitive aspect involves finding out or inferring and understanding another person's emotional state (e.g., sadness, fear, or pain). The affective aspect includes the emotional response to ourselves in perceiving the other person's feeling. In particular, this emotional response is appropriate to or congruent with another’s situation than to one’s own (Eisenberg & Fabes, 1990 ; Hoffman, 1984 ; Moul et al., 2018 ). Empathy is associated with prosocial behavior such as helping and comforting others and contributes to the inhibition of antisocial and aggressive behavior (Eisenberg & Miller, 1987 ; Miller & Eisenberg, 1988 ). However, systematic and meta-analytic reviews of empathy show considerable inconsistencies in the assumed association between empathy and conduct problems. Differences in the measures used and the conceptualization of empathy have been suggested to, at least in part, contribute to the heterogeneous findings (Moul et al., 2018 ).

Lack of empathy is one of cardinal features of callous-unemotional (CU) traits (Frick et al., 2014 ). In the DSM-5, CU traits are labeled as ‘limited prosocial emotions,’ a diagnostic specifier for individuals who meet full criteria for Conduct Disorder. Limited prosocial emotions include the following characteristics: lack of empathy, lack of remorse or guilt, shallow or deficient effect, and unconcerned about performance (American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ). Children and adolescents with both severe conduct problems and elevated CU traits are at risk for more severe and persistent antisocial outcomes (Frick et al., 2014 ). They also tend to be less responsive to psychological treatment (Frick et al., 2014 ).

Blair ( 1995 ) suggested that in humans, a victim’s pain and distress induce similar feelings of distress in the aggressor, which in turn stops further aggressive behavior. Children and adolescents with a deficit in this mechanism will be less likely to learn to avoid harming other individuals, because the distress of other individuals is less aversive for them. These children and adolescents are, therefore, more likely to continue displaying behaviors that harm others to achieve their goals.

Distress-related cues, particularly fearful expressions, play an important role in inhibiting antisocial behavior (Blair, 2001 ). A meta-analysis showed a strong association between antisocial behavior and deficits in recognizing fearful expressions (Marsh & Blair, 2008 ). Consistent with this, in an fMRI study, children and adolescents with conduct problems and CU traits showed reduced amygdala responsiveness during the presentation of fearful facial expressions in comparison to healthy controls and youth with ADHD. Interestingly, functional connectivity analyses demonstrated lower correlations between the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in youth with conduct problems and CU traits as compared to healthy controls and youth with ADHD (Marsh et al., 2008 ). Impairments in amygdala-ventromedial prefrontal cortex connectivity are suggested to be associated with antisocial behavior as a result of instrumental behavior that is inappropriately modulated by others’ distress (Marsh et al., 2008 ). In addition, adolescents with conduct problems and psychopathic traits, including reduced empathy and guilt, showed reduced activity in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex, ventral striatum, and amygdala in response to observing increased pain in others (Marsh et al., 2013 ). Also, reduced activity in the insula while viewing others being harmed was related to children’s greater CD symptoms and CU traits (Michalska et al., 2016 ). Interestingly, reduced left anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus responses in adolescents with conduct problems and CU traits relative to normal controls were found when participants were asked to judge their own emotional reactions to fearful and angry expressions (Klapwijk et al., 2016 ). These findings suggest that adolescents with conduct problems and CU traits resonate less with the feelings of others (Klapwijk et al., 2016 ). Impairments in affective empathy have also been demonstrated in children and adolescents with conduct problems without CU traits (Martin-Key et al., 2017 ) and in children aged 7–11 years with disruptive behavior referred into a crime prevention program (Hunnikin et al., 2020 ).

Difficulties in affective empathy in response to other’s distress can result in the maintenance of aggressive behavior. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether improving affective empathy, in particular in response to other’s distress, using virtual reality (see further Dellazizzo et al., 2019 ), affects aggressive behavior, especially in those children and adolescents with limited prosocial emotions.

Currently, in CBT, much attention is given to perspective taking, in particular understanding another person’s intentions as children and adolescents with aggressive behavior are inclined to attribute hostile intentions to others (De Castro et al., 2002 ; Verhoef et al., 2019 ). Attention is also given to better understand the emotions of others, but whereas cognitive empathy is a central theme, affective empathy is not. Here, we suggest that improving affective empathetic responding, in particular in response to other’s distress, should be a target in CBT. Children and adolescents with conduct problems, especially those with limited prosocial emotions, must learn to pay attention to the child’s distress towards whom they start displaying aggressive behavior and must experience themselves how it feels like if this is done to them, with a view to stopping this behavior. This requires a lot of practice, possibly adding virtual reality, as individuals tend to respond realistically to virtual simulations of real-life events (Dellazizzo et al., 2019 ), to the everyday life situations. Parents, foster parents, child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment centers, and teachers can learn how to help the child or adolescent in paying attention to peer’s distress when the child or adolescent starts showing behavior that physically and/or mentally harms others (in vivo practice).

Lack of remorse or guilt is another characteristic of limited prosocial emotions, related to lack of empathy. The amygdala plays a role in care-based moral judgements (Blair, 2007 ). As already discussed, reduced amygdala responsiveness to the distress of other individuals has been shown in children and adolescents with conduct problems and with CU traits (Marsh et al., 2008 ). In line with this, adolescents with conduct problems and psychopathic traits showed reduced amygdala activity when making judgements about legal/illegal actions; thus, psychopathic traits appear to be associated with these adolescents’ ability to attach the appropriate valence to actions of varying moral permissibility (Marsh et al., 2011 ). These findings suggest that for adolescents with conduct problems and limited prosocial emotions, it is appropriate to include moral reasoning in CBT (see Aggression Replacement Training; Goldstein et al., 1998 ), for example in the context of generating solutions to social problems. A slow learning process must be taken into account here as well.

The mean effect size of psychotherapy for conduct problems in children and adolescents has been shown to decrease over the last 50 years (1963–2016), suggesting that adjustments are needed in some of the approaches that have been followed thus far (Weisz et al., 2019 ). Most evidence-based CBT programs were developed during the last three decades of the previous century and only slightly updated in the present century. Results of neuroimaging research into a series of psychological functions have not been incorporated in this update: anger recognition, the ability to generate appropriate solutions to social problems, reinforcement-based decision making, response inhibition, and affective empathy. We propose that these psychological functions deserve more attention in CBT and that working on these psychological abilities only during CBT sessions is not sufficient. Children’s and adolescents’ use of these psychological abilities in everyday life, on the other hand, must be elicited, supported, and reinforced by parents, foster parents, or child care workers in day treatment and residential centers. Therefore, parents or other adults must be intensively involved in the CBT of their child, by participating in part of the sessions, but especially by finding out, with the help of the therapist, how the learning processes of which the first steps were taken in the sessions can be continued in everyday life.

In addition, the increased child’s and adolescent’s competence to use cognitive skills goes hand in hand with learning behavioral skills. For example, a prerequisite for generating an appropriate solution or for selecting an appropriate one between different solutions generated is that children and adolescents have experienced that appropriate solutions work for them and as a result become part of their behavioral repertoire. Thus, therapists and parents, foster parents and child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment centers, need also to work on the improvement of the child’s or adolescent’s behavioral repertoire using the typical parenting skills targeted in behavioral parent training such as giving positive instructions and praising. If these appropriate behaviors work for the child and the adolescent and are perceived as rewarding by them, they are stored in long-term memory, can be generated as possible responses, and finally chosen as the best response based on positive outcomes both on the short and long term. Much perseverance is needed here before associations between responses and reward are made due to problems in making these associations.

The developing brain of children and adolescents is plastic and exhibits greater learning capacity as compared to the adult brain. It is, therefore, not unreasonable to assume that psychological-based interventions at a relatively early age have a positive and lasting effect on brain maturation and neural organization (Ismael et al., 2017 ). There is, for instance, evidence that experience-based brain plasticity can have positive effects paralleled by associated functional as well as structural neuroanatomical changes in children with ADHD (Hoekzema et al., 2011 ). In addition to making use of these developmental windows of opportunity by promoting learning during CBT sessions as well as in the everyday life setting, promoting a healthy life style is likely to have positive effects as well (Diamond & Ling, 2016 ). For example, a balanced eating diet, sufficient amount of sleep, and physical activity (e.g., sports) may improve learning and executive functioning which, in turn, enhance psychological functions associated with anger regulation and social problem solving.

Just as children and adolescents with conduct problems differ in symptoms (e.g., reactive aggression and CU traits), so they differ in the psychological functions that need to be specifically addressed, such as anger recognition, generating appropriate solutions, or affective empathic responding. Therefore, CBT should be tailored to the individual psychological disabilities. In addition to working with the child or adolescent, engaging parents or other adults provide an opportunity for the therapist to personalize CBT. A modular approach as first used in CBT for anxiety disorders and subsequently for other types of psychopathology may be appropriate here (Chorpita et al., 2004 ; Evans et al., 2020 ). A modular approach preserves the benefits of standardization of manualized protocols, while, at the same time, modules can be flexibly arranged so that the content, order, and dose are adjusted to the child and adolescent characteristics. If deemed appropriate, the use of individual or group sessions can also be included in this approach.

Group format is engaging for children and adolescents and offers many opportunities for modeling. However, group formats can sometimes be unnecessarily long for individual children or adolescents if they already display specific anger management or social problem-solving skills in their repertoire. If this is the case, then the number of group sessions with the child or adolescent can be reduced to make room for individual sessions tailored to the individual characteristics of the child’s or adolescent’s psychological functions that need improvement.

For example, psychoeducational group sessions are aimed at introducing the set of anger management and social problem-solving skills that will be worked on in individual sessions later. Thus, children and adolescents first become familiar with the cognitive and behavioral skills during group psychoeducational sessions on anger management (one module) and social problem solving (another module). Subsequently, in individual sessions in which the parents or other adults (e.g., child care workers) and the child or adolescent participate, parents learn to elicit, support, and reinforce their child’s use of anger management skills (several modules) and social problem-solving skills (several modules) during everyday life. In these individual sessions, working on the psychological functions is tailored to the individual child’s characteristic impaired functions. Homework assignments are used to practice skills tailored to the individual child, adolescent, and parent at home. With regard to effectiveness of individual versus group delivery of CBT, according to parents, individual delivery of the child component of Coping Power was as effective as group delivery, whereas according to teachers, individual delivery was more effective (Lochman et al., 2015 ).

For the improvement of anger management and social problem-solving skills, a lot of practice is needed. The school offers unique opportunities for this. Indicated preventive interventions that also target children with clinical levels of conduct problems, have chosen the school as the social context for intervention, also for practical reasons. The Fast Track project has shown that the intervention’s impact on the prevention of later crime and to a lesser extent of general and mental health problems can be accounted for by improvements in self-regulation and problem-solving skills (Sorenson et al., 2016 ). Children and adolescents spend a lot of time at school in a wide variety of social contexts that may be a problem for them, such as situations in which the child is being disadvantaged or must cope with competition (Dodge et al., 1985 ; Matthys et al., 2001 ). Although the learning processes aimed at anger regulation and social problem solving are initiated in the CBT sessions, they must be given a chance to continue at school. Therefore, the CBT therapist shares crucial learning topics for the student with the teacher with a view to creating learning opportunities for the student. Just like parents, teachers may also have collaborative discussions with students how to proactively and collaboratively solve daily social problems (Greene, 1998 ; Ollendick et al., 2016 ).

Engaging families in psychological treatment for conduct problems is challenging (Acri et al., 2018 ). Data from 262 studies for example showed that at least 25% of the parents of children aged 2–12 years identified as appropriate for behavioral parent training do not start treatment, and an additional 26% begin, but drop out before completing treatment (Chacko et al., 2016 ). When behavioral parent training is the only psychological therapy suggested by the clinician who performed the clinical evaluation of the child or adolescent, parents may not start treatment because they think that their parenting skills are of a sufficient level and their child has to deal with his or her problems. These parents may be right as it has been shown that not all families benefit equally from behavioral parent training, in part because parenting skills in some families are not clearly inappropriate (Van Aar et al., 2019 ). Also, parents may drop out of treatment after a few sessions because they think their parenting skills have now reached an adequate level and the child now needs to work on his or her problems. So involving the child himself or herself in the treatment either from the start or after a series of behavioral parent training sessions in order to improve his or her anger regulation and social problem-solving skills may increase the likelihood that the treatment will start or be completed.

There is consensus among clinical researchers that children derive increasing benefit from CBT with increasing age (Fairchild et al., 2019 ). Adding CBT to behavioral parent training may increase the effect of behavioral parent training in children aged from 7 years on. Kazdin and colleagues examined whether the combination of Problem-Solving Skills Training (a CBT program) and Parent Management Training (a behavioral parent training program) generated an intervention that was more potent than either treatment alone in children with conduct problems aged 7–13 years (Kazdin et al., 1992 ). The combined treatment led to more marked changes in antisocial behavior of the child and in parental stress than Problem-Solving Skills Training only and Parent Management Training only. The effect was also evident in the proportion of children that the combined treatment placed within the normative range of functioning in comparison with either treatment alone (Kazdin et al., 1992 ).

For the treatment of adolescents with conduct problems, CBT can be added to family-based psychotherapy (e.g., Functional Family Therapy; Alexander et al., 2013 ) or may become part of interventions targeting multiple systems (e.g., Multisystemic Therapy; Henggeler et al., 2009 ). Increasing the effectiveness of CBT for adolescents is needed as a meta-analysis of Multisystemic Therapy, specifically indicated for adolescents with the most severe conduct problems such as violent offenders and conduct problems associated with substance abuse, showed small effect sizes: d  = 0.20 for delinquency and d  = 0.29 for psychopathology (Van der Stouwe et al., 2014 ). Likewise, as already mentioned, the ES of CBT in youths treated for antisocial behavior in residential settings is only d  = 0.25 (Armelius & Andreassen, 2007 ).

Finally, the perspective we adopted was a non-systematic review of the available neuroimaging literature to examine the neural basis of psychological functions that are implicated in the effectiveness of CBT programs. However, we acknowledge that the number of neuroimaging studies is limited. In addition to the five psychological functions discussed in the present review, other psychological functions, such as working memory, which are not included in the CBT programs may be relevant as well.

Although the literature on anger regulation and social problem solving is extensive, the present review of functional neuroimaging studies suggests that some psychological functions targeted in CBT may need more attention: anger recognition, the ability to generate situation appropriate solutions to social problems, reinforcement-based decision making, response inhibition, and affective empathy. Directly following from the observations that these psychological functions may be impaired in conduct problems, a number of suggestions to increase therapeutic effectiveness of CBT were made. While these require a close collaboration of the therapist with parents, teachers and child care workers in day treatment and residential centers, taking into consideration specific psychological dysfunctions may be beneficial to improving the effectiveness of CBT in the treatment of conduct problems.

Acri, M., Chacko, A., Gopalan, G., & McKay, M. (2018). Engaging families in treatment for child behavior disorders: A synthesis of the literature. In J. E. Lochman, & W. Matthys (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of disruptive and impulsive-control disorders (pp. 393–409). Wiley.

Alegria, A. A., Radua, J., & Rubia, K. (2016). Meta-analysis of fMRI studies of disruptive behavior disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15081089

Article   Google Scholar  

Alexander, J. F., Waldron, H. B., Robbins, M. S., & Neeb, A. A. (2013). Functional family therapy for adolescent behavior problems . American Psychological Association.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association.

Angold, A., Costello, E. J., & Erkanli, A. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00424

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Armelius, B. A., & Andreassen, T. H. (2007). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for antisocial behavior in youth in residential treatment. Cochrane Database Systematic Review . https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005650.pub2

Augimeri, L. K., Farrington, D. P., Koegl, C. J., & Day, D. M. (2007). The SNAP under 12 outreach project: Effects of a community based program for children with conduct problems. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 799–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl10826-006-9126-x

Averbeck, B. B., & Costa, V. D. (2017). Motivational neural circuits underlying reinforcement learning. Nature Neuroscience, 20, 505–512.

Blair, R. J. R. (1995). A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition, 57, 1–29.

Blair, R. J. R. (2001). Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 71, 727–731. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.6.727

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Blair, R. J. R. (2007). The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003

Blair, R. J. R. (2010). Psychopathy, frustration, and reactive aggression: The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X418418480

Blair, R. J., Morris, J. S., Frith, C. D., Perrett, D. I., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). Dissociable neural responses to facial expressions of sadness and anger. Brain, 122, 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.5.883

Blair, R. J. R., Veroude, K., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2018). Neuro-cognitive system dysfunction and symptom sets: A review of fMRI studies in youth with conduct problems. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.022

Bonham, M. D., Shanley, D. C., Waters, A., & Elvin, O. M. (2021). Inhibitory control deficits in children with oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder compared to attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49, 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00713-9

Bowen, K. L., Morgan, J. E., Moore, S. C., & Van Goozen, S. H. (2016). Young offenders’ emotion recognition dysfunction across emotion intensities: Explaining variation using psychopathic traits, conduct disorder and offense severity. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 66, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9368-2

Burke, J. D., & Loeber, R. (2015). The effectiveness of the Stop Now and Plan (SNAP) program for boys at risk for evidence and delinquency. Prevention Science, 16, 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0490-2

Chacko, A., Kofler, M., & Jarrett, M. (2014). Improving outcomes for youth with ADHD: A conceptual framework for combined neurocognitive and skill-base treatment approaches. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 17, 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-014-0171-5

Chacko, A., Jensen, S. A., Lowry, L. S., Cornwell, M., Chimklis, A., Chan, Lee, D., & Pulgarin, B. (2016). Engagement in behavioral parent training: Review of the literature and implications for practice. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 19, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-016-0205-2

Chorpita, B. F., Taylor, A. A., Francis, S. E., Moffitt, C., & Austin, A. A. (2004). Efficacy of modular cognitive behavior therapy for childhood anxiety disorders. Behavior Therapy . https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80039-X

Cohn, M. D., Veltman, D. J., Pape, L. E., van Lith, K., Vermeiren, R. R. J. M., Van den Brink, W., Doreleijers, T. A. H., & Popma, A. (2015). Incentive processing in persistent disruptive behavior and psychopathic traits: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in adolescents. Biological Psychiatry, 78, 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.017

Costa, V. D., & Averbeck, B. B. (2020). Primate orbitofrontal cortex codes information relevant for managing explore-exploit tradeoffs. Journal of Neuroscience, 40, 2553–2561. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSC.2355-19-2020

Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.

De Castro, B. O., Veerman, J. W., Koops, W., Bosch, J. D., & Monshouwer, H. J. (2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 73, 916–934.

Dellazizzo, L., Potvin, S., Bahig, S., & Dumains, A. (2019). Comprehensive review on virtual reality for the treatment of violence: Implications for youth with schizophrenia. Npj Schizophrenia, 5, 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-019-0079-7

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2016). Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005

Dodge, K. A., Godwin, J., & The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2013). Social-information-processing patterns mediate the impact of preventive intervention on adolescent antisocial behavior. Psychological Science, 24, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457394

Dodge, K. A., McClaskey, C. L., & Feldman, E. (1985). Situational approach to the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.53.3.344

Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., McClaskey, C. L., & Brown, M. M. (1986). Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development . https://doi.org/10.2307/1165906

Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 14, 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0991640

Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119.

Evans, S. C., Weisz, J. R., Carvalho, A. C., Garibaldi, P. M., Bearman, S. K., Chorpita, B. F., & Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2020). Effects of standard and modular psychotherapies in the treatment of youth with severe irritability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88, 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000456

Fairchild, G., Hagan, C. C., Passamonti, L., Walsh, N. D., Goodyer, I. M., & Calder, A. J. (2014). Atypical neural responses during face processing in female adolescents with conduct disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2014.02.009

Fairchild, G., Hawes, D. J., Frick, P. J., Copeland, W. E., Odgers, C. L., Franke, B., Freitag, C. M., & De Brito, S. A. (2019). Conduct disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 27 (5), 43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0095-y

Fairchild, G., Van Goozen, S. H. M., Calder, A. J., Stollery, S. J., & Goodyer, I. M. (2009). Deficits in facial expression recognition in male adolescents with early-onset and late-onset conduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02020.x

Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Ridder, E. M. (2005). Show me the child at seven: The consequences of conduct problems in childhood for psychosocial functioning in adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 837–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.00387.x

Finger, E. C., Marsh, A. A., Blair, K. S., Reid, M. E., Sims, C., Ng, P., Pine, D. S., & Blair, R. J. (2011). Disrupted reinforcement signaling in the orbitofrontal cortex and caudate in youths with conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder and a high level of psychopathic traits. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10010129

Fontaine, R. G., Burks, V. S., & Dodge, K. A. (2002). Response decision processes and externalizing behavior problems in adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579402001062

Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033076

Garland, A. F., Hawley, K. M., Brookman-Frazee, L., & Hurlburt, M. S. (2008). Identifying common elements for evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children’s disruptive behavior problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e31816765c2

Goldstein, A. D., Glick, B., & Gibbs, J. C. (1998). Aggression Replacement Training: A comprehensive intervention for aggressive youth (revised edition) . Research Press.

Greene, R. W. (1998). The explosive child: A new approach for understanding and parenting easily frustrated, “chronically inflexible” children . HarperCollins.

Hare, T. A., O’Doherty, J., Camerer, C. F., Schultz, W., & Rangel, A. (2008). Dissociating the role of the orbitofrontal cortex and the striatum in the computation of goal values and prediction errors. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 5623–5630. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1309-08.2008

Henggeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Borduin, C. M., Rowland, M. D., & Cunningham, P. B. (2009). Multisystemic therapy for antisocial behavior in children and adolescents (second edition) . The Guilford Press.

Hoekzema, E., Carmona, S., Ramos-Quiroga, J. A., Barba, E., Bielsa, A., Tremols, V., Rovira, M., Soliva, J. C., Casas, M., Bulbena, A., Tobeña, A., & Vilarroya, O. (2011). Training-induced neuroanatomical plasticity in ADHD: A tensor-based morphometric study. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 1741–1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21143

Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In C. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonic (Eds.), Emotions, cognitions and behavior. Cambridge University Press.

Hornsveld, R. H. J., Kraaimaat, F. W., Muris, P., Zwets, A. J., & Kanters, T. (2015). Aggression replacement training for violent young men in a forensic psychiatric outpatient clinic. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 3174–3191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514555007

Hubbard, J. A., McAuliffe, M. D., Morrow, M. T., & Romano, L. J. (2010). Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: Precursors, outcomes, processes, experiences, and measurement. Journal of Personality, 78, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00610.x

Hunnikin, L. M., Wells, A. E., Ash, D. P., & Van Goozen, S. H. M. (2020). The nature and extent of emotion recognition and empathy impairments in children showing disruptive behavior referred into a criminal prevention programme. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01358-w

Hwang, S., Nolan, Z. T., White, S. F., Williams, W. C., Sinclair, S., & Blair, R. J. R. (2016). Dual neurocircuitry dysfunctions in disruptive behavior disorders: Emotional responding and response inhibition. Psychological Medicine, 46, 1485–1496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000118

Ismael, F. Y., Fatemi, A., & Johnston, M. V. (2017). Cerebral plasticity: Windows of opportunity in the developing brain. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 21, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.e.jpn.2016.07.007

Kaminski, J. W., & Klaussen, A. H. (2017). Evidence base update for psychosical treatment for disruptive behaviors in children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46, 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1310044

Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Parent management training. Treatment for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behaviour in children and adolescents. Oxford University Press.

Kazdin, A. E., Bass, D., Siegel, T., & Thomas, C. (1989). Cognitive-behavioral therapy and relationship therapy in the treatment of children referred for antisocial behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 522–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.57.4.522

Kazdin, A., Esveldt-Dawson, K., French, N. H., & Unis, A. S. (1987). Problem-solving skills training and relationship therapy in the treatment of antisocial child behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.55.76

Kazdin, A. E., Siegel, T. C., & Bass, D. (1992). Cognitive problem-solving skill training and parent management training in the treatment of antisocial behavior in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 733–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.60.5.733

Kim-Cohen, J., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Harrington, H., Milne, B. J., & Poulton, R. (2003). Prior juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder: Developmental follow-back of a prospective-longitudinal cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 709–717.

Klapwijk, E. T., Afgajani, M., Colins, O. F., Marijnissen, G. M., Popma, A., Van Lang, N. D. J., Van der Wee, N. J. A., & Vermeiren, R. R. J. M. (2016). Different brain responses during empathy in autism spectrum disorders versus conduct disorder and callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12498

Kofler, M. J., Wells, E. L., Singh, L. J., Soto, E. F., Irwin, L. N., Groves, N. B., Chan, E. S. M., Miller, C. E., Richmond, K. P., Schatschneider, C., & Lonigan, C. J. (2020). A randomized controlled trial of central executive training (CET) versus inhibitory control training (ICT) for ADHD. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88, 738–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000550

Kofler, M. J., Sarver, D. E., Austin, K. E., Schaeffer, H. S., Holland, E., Aduan, P. A., Wells, E. L., Soto, E. F., Irwin, L. N., Groves, Schatschneider, C., & Lonigan, C. J. (2018). Can working memory training work for ADHD? Development of central executive training and comparison with behavioral parent training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86, 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000308

Kohls, G., Baumann, S., Gundlach, M., Scharke, W., Berhard, A., Martinelli, A., et al. (2020). Investigating sex differences in emotion recognition, learning and regulation among youths with conduct disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 59, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.04.003

Leijten, P., Gardner, F., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Van Aar, J., Hutchings, J., Schulz, S., Knerr, W., & Overbeek, G. (2019). Meta-analyses: Key parenting components for disruptive child behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 58, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2018.07.900

Leno, V. C., Chandler, S., White, P., Pickles, A., Baird, G., Hobson, C., Smith, A. B., Charman, T., Rubia, K., & Simonoff, E. (2018). Testing the specificity of executive functioning impairments in adolescents with ADHD, ODD/CD and ASD. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-1089-5

Lochman, J. E., Boxmeyer, C. L., Kassing, F. L., Powell, N. P., & Stromeyer, S. L. (2019). Cognitive behavioral intervention for youth at risk for conduct problems: Future directions. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 48, 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2019.1567349

Lochman, J. E., Dishion, T. J., Powell, N. P., Boxmeyer, C. L., Qu, L., & Sallee, M. (2015). Evidence-based prevention intervention for preadolescent aggressive children: One-year outcomes following randomization to group versus individual delivery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83, 728–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000030

Lochman, J. E., & Lampron, L. B. (1986). Situational social problem solving skills and self-esteem of aggressive and non-aggressive boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 605–617.

Lochman, J. E., Nelson, W. M., III., & Sims, J. P. (1981). A cognitive behavioural program for use with aggressive children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 10, 146–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374418109533036

Lochman, J. E., Wells, K. C., & Lenhart, L. A. (2008). Coping power child group program: Facilitator guide. Oxford.

Marsh, A. A., & Blair, R. J. R. (2008). Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiorev.2007.08.003

Marsh, A. A., Finger, E. C., Fowler, K. A., Adalno, C. J., Jurkowitz, J. T. N., Schechter, J. C., Pine, D. S., Decety, J., & Blair, R. J. R. (2013). Empathic responsiveness in amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex in youths with psychopathic traits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12063

Marsh, A. A., Finger, E. C., Fowler, K. A., Jurkowitz, J. T. N., Schechter, J. C., Yu, H. H., Pine, D. S., & Blair, R. J. R. (2011). Reduced amygdala-orbitofrontal connectivity during moral judgements in youths with disruptive behaviour disorders and psychopathic traits. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 194, 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychresns.2011.07.008

Marsh, A. A., Finger, E. C., Mitchell, D. G. V., Reid, M., Sims, C., Kosson, D. S., Towbin, K. E., Leibenluft, E., Pine, D. S., & Blair, R. J. R. (2008). Reduced amygdala response to fearful expressions in children and adolescents with callous-unemotional traits and disruptive behaviour disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 712–720. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07071145.%20

Martin-Key, N., Brown, T., & Fairchild, G. (2017). Empathic accuracy in male adolescents with conduct disorder and higher versus lower levels of callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45, 1385–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0243-8

Matthys, W., Cuperus, J., & Van Engeland, H. (1999). Deficient social problem-solving in boys with ODD/CD, with ADHD, and with both disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-19993000-00019

Matthys, W., & Lochman, J. E. (2017). Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder in childhood . (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Matthys, W., Maassen, G. H., Cuperus, J. M., & Van Engeland, H. (2001). The assessment of the situational specificity of children’s problem behaviour in peer-peer context. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00734

Matthys, W., Van Goozen, S., De Vries, H., Cohen-Kettenis, P., & Van Engeland, H. (1998). The dominance of behavioural activation over behavioural inhibition in conduct disordered boys with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00364

Matthys, W., Van Goozen, S. H. M., Snoek, H., & Van Engeland, H. (2004). Response perseveration and sensitivity to reward and punishment in boys with oppositional defiant disorder. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 362–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-004-0395-x

Matthys, W., Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2013). The neurobiology of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder: Altered functioning in three mental domains. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000272

Matthys, W., Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J., Schutter, D. J. L. G., & Lochman, J. E. (2012). Impaired neurocognitive functions affect social learning processes in oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: Implications for interventions. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15, 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-012-0118-7

Matthys, W., Walterbos, W., Van Engeland, H., & Koops, W. (1995). Conduct disordered boys’ perception of their liked peers. Cognitive Theory & Research, 19, 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230405

McCart, M. R., Priester, P. E., Davies, W. H., & Azen, R. (2006). Differential effectiveness of behavioral parent-training and cognitive-behavioral therapy for antisocial youth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9031-1

McCart, M. R., & Sheidow, A. J. (2016). Evidence-based psychosocial treatment for adolescents with disruptive behaviour. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45, 529–563. https://doi.org/10.1080//15374416.2016.1146990

Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavioral modification: An integrated approach. Guilford.

Michalska, K. J., Zeffiro, T. A., & Decety, J. (2016). Brain response to viewing others being harmed in children with conduct disorder symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12474

Miller, P. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1988). The relation of empathy and aggression and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/033-2909.103.3.324

Miller, S., Boxmeyer, C., Romero, D., Powell, N., Jones, S., & Lochman, J. (2020). Theoretical model of mindful coping power: Optimizing a cognitive behavioral program for high-risk children and their parents by integrating mindfulness. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23, 393–406.

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637211411429458

Moul, C., Hawes, D. J., & Dadds, M. R. (2018). Mapping the developmental pathway of child conduct problems through the neurobiology of empathy. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 91, 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.016

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2013, 2017). Antisocial behavior and conduct disorders in children and young people: Recognition, intervention and management . (Clinical guideline 158) https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG158/chapter/1-Recommendations#psychosocial-interventions-treatment-and-indicated-prevention

Noordermeer, S. D. S., Luman, M., & Oosterlaan, J. (2016). A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging in Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) and Conduct Disorder (CD) taking Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) into account. Neuropsychology Review, 26, 44–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-015-9315-8

O’Doherty, J. P., Buchanan, T. W., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Predictive neural coding of reward preference involves dissociable responses in human ventral midbrain and ventral striatum. Neuron, 49, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.014

Ollendick, T. H., Greene, R. W., Austin, K. E., Fraire, M. G., Holldorsdottir, T., et al. (2016). Parent management training and collaborative & proactive solutions: A randomized control trial for oppositional youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45, 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1004681

Oosterlaan, J., Logan, G. D., & Sergeant, J. A. (1998). Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious, and control children: A meta-analysis of studies with the stop task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00336

Passamonti, L., Fairchild, G., Goodyer, I. M., Hurford, G., Hagan, C. C., Rowe, J. B., & Calder, A. J. (2010). Neural abnormalities in early-onset and adolescence-onset conduct disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.75

Perry, D. G., Perry, L. C., & Rasmussen, P. (1986). Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Development, 57, 700–711. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130347

Pilling, S., Gould, N., Whittington, C., Taylor, C., & Scott, S. (2013). Recognition, intervention and management of antisocial behavior and conduct disorders in children and young people: Summary of NICE-SCIE guidance. British Medical Journal, 346, f1298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1298

Quiggle, N. L., Garber, J., Panak, W., & Dodge, K. A. (1992). Social information-processing in aggressive and depressed children. Child Development, 63, 1305–1320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01696.x

Rivenbark, J. G., Odgers, C. L., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., Hogan, S., Houts, R. M., Poulton, R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2018). The high societal costs of childhood conduct problems: Evidence from administrative records up to age 38 in a longitudinal birth cohort. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59, 703–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12850

Rolls, E. T. (2004). The functions of the orbitofrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition, 55, 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00277-X

Rubia, K. (2011). “Cool” inferior fronstostriatal dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder versus “hot” ventromedial orbitofrontal-limbic dysfunction in conduct disorder: A review. Biological Psychiatry, 69, e69–e87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.023

Rubia, K., Smith, A. B., Halari, R., Matsukara, F., Mohammad, M., Taylor, E., & Brammer, M. J. (2009). Disorder-specific dissociation of orbitofrontal dysfunction in boys with pure conduct disorder during reward and ventrolateral prefrontal dysfunction in boys with pure ADHD during sustained attention. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08020212

Schoemaker, K., Bunte, T., Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., Deković, M., & Matthys, W. (2012). Executive function deficits in preschool children with ADHD and DBD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02468.x

Sorenson, L. C., Dodge, K. A., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Group. (2016). How does the Fast Track Intervention prevent adverse outcomes in young adulthood. Child Development, 87, 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12467

Spivack, G., & Shure, M. B. (1974). Social adjustment of young children: A cognitive approach to solving real-life problems . Jossey-Bass.

Van de Wiel, N. M. H., Matthys, W., Cohen-Kettenis, P., Maassen, G., H., Lochman, J. E., & van Engeland, H. (2007). The effectiveness of an experimental treatment when compared with Care as Usual depends on the type of Care as Usual. Behavior Modification, 31, 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445506292855

Van der Stouwe, T., Asscher, J. J., Stams, G. J. J. M., Dekovic, M., & van der Laan, P. H. (2014). The effectiveness of Multissystemic Therapy (MST): A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.006

Van Goozen, S. H. M., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., Snoek, H., Matthys, W., Swaab-Barneveld, H., & Van Engeland, H. (2004). Executive functioning in children: a comparison of hospitalized ODD and ODD/ADHD children and normal controls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00220.x

Van Nieuwenhuijzen, M., Van Rest, M. M., Embregts, P. J. M., Vriens, A., Oostermeijer, S., Van Bokhoven, I., & Matthys, W. (2017). Executive functions and social information processing in adolescents with severe behavior problems. Child Neuropsychology, 23, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2015.1108396

Van Rest, M. M., Van Nieuwenhuijzen, M., Kupersmidt, J. B., Vriens, A., Schuengel, C., & Matthys, W. (2020). Accidental and ambiguous situations reveal specific iformation processing biases and deficits in adolescents with low clinical level and clinical levels of externalizing behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48, 1411–1424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00676-x

Van Aar, J., Leijten, P., Orobio de Castro, B., Weeland, J., Matthys, W., Chhangur, R., & Overbeek, G. (2019). Families who benefit and families who do not: Integrating person- and variable-centered analyses of parenting intervention responses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 58, 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.02.004

Verhoef, R. E. J., Alsem, S. C., Verhulp, E. E., & De Castro, B. O. (2019). Hostile intention attribution and aggressive behaviour in children revisited: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 90, e525-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13255

Waschbusch, D. A. (2002). A meta-analytic examination of comorbid hyperactive-impulsive-attention problems and conduct problems. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 118–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.118

Weisz, J. R., Kuppens, S., Ng, M. Y., Eckshtain, D., Ugneto, A. M., Vaughn-Coaxum, R., et al. (2017). What five decades of research tell us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. American Psychologist, 72, 79–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040360

Weisz, J. R., Kuppens, S., Ng, M. Y., Vaughn-Coaxum, R. A., Ugneto, A. M., Eckshtain, D., & Corteselli, K. A. (2019). Are psychotherapies for young people growing stronger? Tracing trends over time for youth anxiety, depression, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and conduct problems. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 216–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618805436

Wells, K. C., Lochman, J. E., & Lenhart, L. A. (2008). Coping power parent group program: Facilitator guide . Oxford.

White, S. F., Fowler, K. A., Sinclair, S., Schechter, J. C., Majestic, C. M., Pine, D. S., & Blair, R. J. R. (2014). Disrupted expected value signaling in youth with disruptive behavior disorders to environmental reinforcers. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.12.023

White, S. F., Pope, K. P., Sinclair, S., Fowler, K. A., Brislin, S. J., Williams, W. C., Pine, D. S., & Blair, R. J. R. (2013). Disrupted expected value and prediction error signaling in youths with disruptive behavior disorders during a passive avoidance task. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12060840

White, S. F., Tyler, P. M., Erway, A. K., Botkin, M. L., Kolli, V., Meffert, H., Pope, K., & Blair, J. R. (2016). Dysfunctional representation of expected value is associated with reinforcement-based decision-making deficits in adolescents with conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57 , 938–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12557

World Health Association (WHO). (2020). International Classification of Diseases ( ICD-11 ). https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

Zelli, A., Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., Laird, R. D., & The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). The distinction between beliefs legitimizing aggression and deviant processing of social cues: Testing measurement validity and the hypothesis that biased processing mediates the effects of beliefs on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77 , 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.150

Zonnevylle-Bender, M. J. S., Matthys, W., Wiel, N. M. H. van de, & Lochman, J. E. (2007). Preventive effects of treatment of DBD in middle childhood on substance use and delinquent behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000246051.53297.57

Download references

This work was supported by an NWO Innovational research Grant VI.C.181.005 (D.S.).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, P.O. Box 80140, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Walter Matthys

Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Dennis J. L. G. Schutter

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Matthys .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Matthys, W., Schutter, D.J.L.G. Increasing Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Conduct Problems in Children and Adolescents: What Can We Learn from Neuroimaging Studies?. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 24 , 484–499 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-021-00346-4

Download citation

Accepted : 21 February 2021

Published : 08 March 2021

Issue Date : September 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-021-00346-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Conduct problems
  • Neuroimaging
  • Adolescents
  • Residential treatment
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Springer Open Choice

Increasing Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Conduct Problems in Children and Adolescents: What Can We Learn from Neuroimaging Studies?

Walter matthys.

1 Department of Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, P.O. Box 80140, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands

2 Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

Dennis J. L. G. Schutter

3 Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is particularly relevant for children from 7 years on and adolescents with clinical levels of conduct problems. CBT provides these children and adolescents with anger regulation and social problem-solving skills that enable them to behave in more independent and situation appropriate ways. Typically, CBT is combined with another psychological treatment such as behavioral parent training in childhood or an intervention targeting multiple systems in adolescence. The effectiveness of CBT, however, is in the small to medium range. The aim of this review is to describe how the effectiveness of CBT may be improved by paying more attention to a series of psychological functions that have been shown to be impaired in neuroimaging studies: (1) anger recognition, (2) the ability to generate situation appropriate solutions to social problems, (3) reinforcement-based decision making, (4) response inhibition, and (5) affective empathy. It is suggested that children and adolescents first become familiar with these psychological functions during group CBT sessions. In individual sessions in which the parents (and/or child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment) and the child or adolescent participate, parents then learn to elicit, support, and reinforce their child’s use of these psychological functions in everyday life (in vivo practice). In these individual sessions, working on the psychological functions is tailored to the individual child’s characteristic impairments of these functions. CBT therapists may also share crucial social-learning topics with teachers with a view to creating learning opportunities for children and adolescents at school.

Introduction

According to the most recent large meta-analysis of psychological therapy for children and adolescents treated for mental health problems in the clinical range the mean post-treatment effect size (ES, Cohen’s d ) for conduct problems is 0.46 (Weisz et al., 2017 ). The effect sizes of several types of psychological therapy for conduct problems, however, differ from each other.

In the meta-analysis by McCart et al. ( 2006 ), the ES of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in children and adolescents with conduct problems is d  = 0.35 while the ES of behavioral parent training is d  = 0.47. According to a more recent meta-analysis of behavioral parent training, the ES for children aged 2–9 years is even larger: d  = 0.69 (Leijten et al., 2019 ). In the meta-analysis by McCart et al., there was a positive relationship between age and ES for CBT: as youth enter more advanced levels of cognitive development, they receive increased benefits from CBT. Yet in the meta-analysis by Armelius and Andreassen ( 2007 ), the ES of CBT in youths aged 12–22 for the treatment of antisocial behavior in residential setting is only d  = 0.25. According to British guidelines, group CBT for children aged 9–14 years with clinical levels of conduct problems is advised based on low-to moderate-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials (National Institute for Health and Clinical Practice (NICE), 2013 , 2017; Pilling et al., 2013 ). Clearly, attempts at increasing effectiveness of CBT as a psychological treatment for conduct problems in middle childhood and adolescence are appropriate.

One way might be to examine neuroimaging studies that investigate biological correlates of psychological functions targeted in CBT. In CBT, children and adolescents learn better ways to manage their anger and solve social problems by increasing emotion-regulation and problem-solving abilities (Lochman et al., 2019 ; Matthys & Lochman, 2017 ). In particular, children and adolescents learn to identify their level of anger as well as to use coping self-statements, distraction techniques, and brief deep-breathing relaxation methods as a means to handle arousal associated with their anger. They also learn and improve to adequately interpret social problems, generate possible solutions, and decide which solution will be implemented. We will currently review functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies examining psychological functions that are targeted in CBT for conduct problems: anger recognition, the ability to generate situation appropriate solutions to social problems, reinforcement-based decision making, response inhibition, and affective empathy. For this, we use meta-analyses, reviews of neuroimaging studies and separate neuroimaging studies, and discuss results in the context of other studies of these five psychological functions. Thus, our non-systematic review of functional neuroimaging studies is motivated by increasing our understanding of psychological abilities that may improve CBT effectiveness. After presentation of the neuroimaging work of each psychological function, we will provide a conclusion as a theoretical statement and working hypothesis about the potential role of the psychological function in the maintenance of conduct problems and finally discuss possible implications for CBT.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

CBT is particularly relevant for children from 7 years on and for adolescents as CBT provides them with anger regulation and social problem-solving skills that enable them to behave in more independent and situation appropriate ways. Anger management and social problem solving are core elements of evidence-based practice for children with conduct problems (Garland et al., 2008 ). Early CBT programs such as the Anger Control Program (Lochman et al., 1981 ) and Problem-Solving Skills Training (Kazdin et al., 1987 ) were developed as sole interventions for children with conduct problems. For example, Problem-Solving Skills Training was offered in cases when working with parents was not a viable option due to severe family dysfunction or parent psychopathology (Kazdin et al., 1987 ).

Over the years, developers of programs have combined CBT with other psychological treatments such as behavioral parent training in childhood or intervention targeting multiple systems in adolescence. Examples of programs for children aged 7–13 years that have been proven to be effective are Problem-Solving Skills Training combined with Parent Management Training (Kazdin et al., 1992 ); the Coping Power program, a more extended and comprehensive version of the Anger Coping program (Lochman et al., 1981 ), consisting of a child component and a parent component (Lochman et al., 2008 ; Wells et al., 2008 ; Van de Wiel et al., 2007 ; Zonnevylle-Bender et al., 2007 ); the Stop Now and Plan program consisting of several components including a child component and a parent component (Augimeri et al., 2007 ; Burke & Loeber, 2015 ). An example of a program developed for adolescents is the Aggression Replacement Training (Goldstein et al., 1998 ; Hornsveld et al., 2015 ) which involves network meetings between parents, teachers, friends, and social workers or other care providers. For adolescents with severe conduct problems interventions that target multiple environmental systems (e.g., family, peers, school) such as Multisystemic Therapy (Henggeler et al., 2009 ; Van der Stouwe et al., 2014 ) have been developed and may also include a CBT component. For more examples of evidence-based programs, see reviews by Kaminski and Claussen ( 2017 ) and McCart and Sheidow ( 2016 ).

Most psychological interventions for conduct problems that have been proven to be effective are based on operant learning principles (e.g., positive reinforcement) and cognitive learning principles (e.g., use of inner speech). In behavioral parent training, children and adolescents acquire appropriate behaviors and learn to refrain from inappropriate behaviors as a result of parents’ or caregivers’ giving positive instructions, praising appropriate behaviors, ignoring minor inappropriate behaviors, and using time-out for severe inappropriate behaviors (Kazdin, 2005 ). Likewise, in CBT, children and adolescents acquire anger management and problem-solving abilities (Lochman et al., 2019 ; Matthys & Lochman, 2017 ). The effectiveness of these social-learning-based behavioral therapies may depend on children’s and adolescents’ impairments in processing of punishment cues, reward cues, and cognitive control (Matthys et al., 2012 , 2013 ).

In the present review, we will focus on conduct problems in the clinical range, either because children and adolescents meet criteria of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) or Conduct Disorder (CD) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fifth edition; DSM-5 , American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ), Oppositional Defiant Disorder or Conduct-Dissocial Disorder according to the International Classification of Diseases (eleventh edition; ICD-11 , World Health Association, 2020 ), or because they show symptoms in the clinical range on a standardized measure of psychopathology. Finding ways to improve the effectiveness of psychological treatment of conduct problems is of utmost importance, especially given the range of short- and long-term negative outcomes of conduct problems in adulthood, including crime, substance use disorders, suicide attempts, low educational achievement, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, manic episode, schizophreniform disorder, eating disorders (Fergusson et al., 2005 ; Kim-Cohen et al., 2003 ), as well as high costs in terms of service utilization across all three domains of criminal justice, health, and social welfare (Rivenbark et al., 2018 ).

Anger Recognition

Emotional dysregulation during anger is an important mechanism driving reactive aggression in children and adolescents (Hubbard et al., 2010 ). Based on clinical work with low-income aggressive children, Lochman et al. ( 1981 ) developed the Anger Control program that incorporated both the self-instruction training methods from Meichenbaum ( 1977 ) and the social problem-solving training methods from Spivack and Shure ( 1974 ). Anger management skills are crucial for children and adolescents with conduct problems in order to handle the surge in anger to a provocation or frustration before they can successfully begin to use problem-solving strategies. Therefore, in the Coping Power program (Lochman et al., 2008 ), anger coping precedes social problem solving. However, a precondition for children and adolescents with conduct problems to learn managing their anger is to become aware and recognize their own anger.

It might be that children and adolescents with conduct problems have difficulties recognizing anger in others and their own anger. These difficulties have been associated with hyporeactivity of the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortex involved in the processing of angry expressions (Blair et al., 1999 ). Male adolescents and young adults with conduct problems displayed abnormally reduced brain responses of the amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and insula when viewing angry versus neutral faces relative to controls (Passamonti et al., 2010 ). Also, female adolescents with conduct problems demonstrated decreased medial orbitofrontal cortex functioning while viewing facial expressions among which anger relative to controls (Fairchild et al., 2014 ). In addition, reduced left anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus responses have been observed in male adolescents with conduct problems and callous-unemotional (CU) traits relative to normal controls when participants were asked to judge their own emotional reactions to fearful and angry expressions of others (Klapwijk et al., 2016 ).

Several neuroimaging studies suggest that children and adolescents with conduct problems have difficulty in recognizing anger in others and their own feelings of anger. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether including anger recognition as a crucial first step in anger management improves anger management abilities and reduces reactive aggression, especially in those children and adolescents with clear difficulties in anger recognition.

In CBT, improving children’s and adolescents’ anger management abilities is an important topic. For example, in the Coping Power program, one session is devoted to identification of physiological cues of anger (e.g., feeling hot, faster heart rate, tightened muscles) and identification of various levels of anger (e.g., irritated, mad, furious) (Lochman et al., 2008 ). One may question whether one session is sufficient for children with conduct problems to recognize their anger in everyday life situations as this seems to be a major problem for them. In Coping Power trials, the effect sizes for proactive aggression have been as much as three times larger than the effect sizes for reactive aggression (Miller et al., 2020 ). From the viewpoint of enhancing the effects of the program by more precisely and intensively targeting the active mechanisms of reactive aggression, developers of Coping Power will start to include mindfulness in the program (Miller et al., 2020 ). But in their motivation the authors do not seem to consider anger recognition problematic for children and adolescents with conduct problems as no reference is made to psychological studies showing that anger recognition may be problematic for children and adolescents with conduct problems.

Male young offenders demonstrate difficulties in recognizing low intensity anger in others (Bowen et al., 2016 ). Likewise, boys and girls with disruptive behavior referred into a crime prevention program were impaired in anger recognition (Hunnikin et al., 2020 ). Anger recognition was disproportionally impaired in boys with early-onset CD (Fairchild et al., 2009 ). Also, both boys and girls with conduct problems compared to controls showed more difficulties in recognizing facial emotions among which anger (Kohls et al., 2020 ). In their study of social information-processing in aggressive and depressed children, Quiggle et al. ( 1992 ) included the emotions (e.g., anger, sadness) when children were read negative stories. Depressed children reported more inner experienced anger than controls, but surprisingly aggressive children did not. Likewise, a study by Van Rest et al. ( 2020 ) in adolescents with conduct problems did not show differences between these adolescents and controls in their anger after viewing videos depicting problem situations in which youths were disadvantaged by accident, while these adolescents generated more aggressive responses and selected more often an aggressive response among various responses shown. Apparently, these studies have been overlooked by researchers involved in CBT but results are in line with the previously discussed neuroimaging studies. How can anger recognition become a topic in CBT?

In CBT, child and parent components often are offered as separate components: therapists work with parents on their parenting skills and with children on their anger management and social problem-solving skills. Here, we propose that parents or foster parents should become actively involved in CBT; this also applies for child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment. For example, parents can observe their child and therapist working on anger recognition, including the recognition of physiological cues which signal that the child is becoming angry. Parents then learn to develop skills in prompting and praising their child’s use of anger recognition in everyday life (in vivo practice, Kazdin et al., 1989 ). For example, they learn to ask questions such as ‘It seems to me that something is bothering you’ or ‘It seems to me that you feel annoyed,’ and ‘Good of you that you recognize this in yourself.’ In our view, anger recognition in everyday life should become a major theme in CBT as it is a precondition for the next steps consisting of using the coping self-statements, distraction techniques, and brief deep-breathing relaxation methods as a means to handle arousal associated with anger by the child or adolescent.

Furthermore, CBT therapists may also want to inform teachers of the child’s or adolescent’s learning processes. The school is an ideal environment for children and adolescents with conduct problems to improve their anger management and social problem-solving skills given the amount of time they spend in school in a wide variety of social contexts. With regard to anger recognition, we assume that a lot of practice is needed for children and adolescents with conduct problems to actually recognize their anger in socially difficult situations. Like the parents, teachers may prompt and praise the child’s use of anger recognition in everyday life. In addition, teachers may warn the child that a difficult situation is coming for him or her. For example, the child quickly becomes angry when he receives a comment about his school work. The anticipation of a difficult situation may help the child to better recognize his anger and use the anger management skills he or she learns in CBT. Other potential difficult situations are when the child is teased by peers or when a peer outperforms in a game (Dodge et al., 1985 ). These are all problematic social situations that will be addressed in the next section.

The Ability to Generate Situation Appropriate Solutions to Social Problems

In everyday life, children continuously face social problems such as how to respond to situations in which the child is being disadvantaged or how to cope with competition (Dodge et al., 1985 ; Matthys et al., 2001 ). To deal with these challenges, children have at their disposal a set of cognitive skills including defining the problem or interpreting the situation, generating possible solutions, and deciding which solution will be implemented (see social information-processing models by Crick & Dodge, 1994 , and by Dodge et al., 1986 ). In social information-processing research emphasis is put on the aggressive children’s interpretation of the situation as being hostile (see meta-analyses by De Castro et al., 2002 , and by Verhoef et al., 2019 ). On the other hand, only few studies have focused on the quantity and the quality of the solutions generated. As for the number of solutions, boys with conduct problems have been found to generate fewer solutions to problems than their peers in situations in which they have to cope with competition (Matthys et al., 1999 ). With respect to the quality of the responses generated, aggressive children have been shown to offer fewer verbal assertive solutions than their peers (Lochman & Lampron, 1986 ). For treatment purposes, the latter finding is highly relevant: do children and adolescents with conduct problems have appropriate responses in their repertoire?

When individuals demonstrate problems with the processing of reward cues, they are less able to make accurate predictions about which kind of behaviors is beneficial for them (Blair, 2010 ). Reduced reward processing can impair social problem solving, in particular the generation of solutions that are beneficial for them, a topic that may have been underestimated in social information-processing research.

When looking at the brain, the amygdala is thought to be implicated in the formation of stimulus-outcome associations based on environmental feedback and closely interacts with the orbitofrontal cortex, which is implicated in the generation of reinforcement-related expectations (Averbeck & Costa, 2017 ; Costa & Averbeck, 2020 ; Rolls, 2004 ). The orbitofrontal cortex and striatum also play a role in error prediction during learning (Hare et al., 2008 ; O’Doherty et al., 2006 ). In a situation where the individual is choosing whether to make a response associated with a particular value, reinforcement expectancy information provided by the striatum on the basis of prior experience is critical (Blair et al., 2018 ). The striatum and anterior cingulate cortex are also important for prediction of error signals (i.e., detecting a discrepancy between the anticipated and actual outcome). Prediction error signals are thought to facilitate reward and punishment-related feedback learning in terms of error minimization routines. In addition, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex represent reinforcement expectancies (Blair et al., 2018 ; Finger et al., 2011 ). Children and adolescents with conduct problems have been found to show reduced responses in the orbitofrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and striatum during both anticipation and response to rewards (Cohn et al., 2015 ; Finger et al., 2011 ; Rubia et al., 2009 ; White et al., 2013 ).

Difficulties in making correct predictions about which behavior in a certain situation is most beneficial can interfere with children’s and adolescents’ ability to generate situation appropriate solutions. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether improving the generation of situation appropriate solutions improves social problem solving and ultimately reduces conduct problems, especially in those children and adolescents who do not show adequate responses in their cognitive repertoire.

In CBT programs, social problem solving is a core theme. Children and adolescents are encouraged to come up with as many solutions as possible which then are categorized into solution types such as help seeking, verbal assertion, compromise, verbal aggression, and physical aggression. One may question whether CBT therapists should work on this with children and adolescents independently of parents and teachers. Children’s learning to generate appropriate solutions is likely to be a slow process, require a lot of practice, and must, therefore also take place in everyday life situations (in vivo practice). The Fast Track study showed that a multiyear preventive intervention offered at schools including the promotion of children’s social-cognitive skills, children’s social skills, and parenting skills, among others, resulted in a decrease of antisocial behavior. This reduction was mediated by its impact on three social-cognitive processes: reducing hostile-attribution biases, increasing the generation of socially competent responses to social problems, and devaluing aggression (Dodge et al., 2013 ). This study not only demonstrates that increasing children’s generation of appropriate responses to social problems is feasible but is also a mechanism of change and as such constitutes an important aspect of cognitive-behavioral-oriented treatment approaches.

In order to strengthen children’s and adolescents’ ability to produce solutions, CBT therapists may teach parents or foster parents how to assist their child to come up with solutions that are beneficial to the child’s well-being (e.g., solutions resulting in a better relationship with parents, siblings, and peers). This also applies for child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment. Parents can ask their child questions about the social problem such as: ‘What can you do about it?’ And, if needed, parents can give suggestions about which behavior can bring benefits to the child or adolescent himself or herself on the short and long term. But children should also experience for themselves that socially appropriate solutions are rewarding, so that they can become part of their cognitive repertoire.

Therefore, in families where coercive interactions prevail over positive interactions between the child or adolescent and his or her parents and siblings, CBT therapists in their work with parents teach them how to elicit appropriate behaviors in their child by giving positive instructions as well as by relabeling problem behavior in its positive opposite and giving this opposite as an instruction (Kazdin, 2005 ). If these appropriate behaviors produce a rewarding effect on the child, these behaviors are more likely to re-occur in comparable situations and consequently have a higher likelihood that they become part of the child’s behavioral repertoire for dealing with social situations effectively. As a result, these solutions are stored in long-term memory and are accessible as a possible response to a social situation (i.e., they become part of their cognitive repertoire). Much repetition is needed here before associations between responses and reward are made due to problems in making these associations. CBT therapists may work with teachers in a similar way.

As a complement, collaborative discussions with parents may teach children how to generate mutually satisfactory solutions. This approach, called Collaborative and Proactive Solutions (previously referred to as Collaborative Problem Solving) (Greene, 1998 ), focuses on helping children and parents learn to proactively and collaboratively solve daily social problems. In a clinical trial in youth with ODD, the Collaborative and Proactive Solutions program was shown to be equivalent to a behavior parent training program (Ollendick et al., 2016 ).

Reinforcement-Based Decision-Making

The final step in social problem solving is deciding which alternative will be selected among the ones that have been generated (Crick & Dodge, 1994 ; Dodge et al., 1986 ), a step that has often not been included in social information-processing studies. As compared to typically developing boys, school-aged boys with conduct problems who were given the opportunity to select a response among a number of options shown in videos, including prosocial responses, more often selected an aggressive response, and less frequently a prosocial response in situations in which they are being disadvantaged (Matthys et al., 1999 ). Likewise, adolescents with conduct problems more often selected an aggressive response among the various response options as compared with their typically developing peers in accidental situations (i.e., situations in which they are being disadvantaged by accident) (Van Rest et al., 2020 ). It is interesting to note that children and adolescents with conduct problems even after an extensive assessment of the social information process in which examples of appropriate responses are shown and numerous questions about the various responses asked, are still inclined to select an aggressive response (Van Rest et al., 2020 ).

The response-decision process is assumed to be affected by outcome expectations and evaluations based on moral values (Crick & Dodge, 1994 ). Children and adolescents with aggressive behavior expect aggressive behavior to lead to favorable outcomes (Fontaine et al., 2002 ; Perry et al., 1986 ). In addition, children with aggressive behavior have been shown to have positive evaluations of aggressive outcomes (Zelli et al., 1999 ). Moreover, a stronger belief that aggressive retaliation is acceptable predicts more future aggressive behavior (Zelli et al., 1999 ).

In neurobiological research, reinforcement-based decision-making studies show that reduced neural responsiveness to reward puts an individual at risk of poor decision making because response choices are less guided by expectations that an action will result in reward relative to punishment (Blair et al., 2018 ). A meta-analysis of whole-brain fMRI studies showed that the most consistent dysfunction in children and adolescents with conduct problems involves the rostro-dorsomedial, fronto-cingulate, and ventral-striatal regions that mediate reward-based decision making (Alegria et al., 2016 ). In addition, anterior insular cortex, dorsomedial frontal cortex, and caudate nucleus of the striatum have been found to be implicated in avoidance-related behavior (Blair et al., 2018 ). Dysfunctions in these regions when making suboptimal choices as a function of expected value have been found in adolescents with conduct problems (White et al., 2014 ) and are correlated to increased risk for antisocial behavior (White et al., 2016 ).

Difficulties in decision making based on uncertainties about reward and punishment outcomes can impede children’s and adolescents’ ability to make decisions about appropriate solutions to social problems. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether improving decision making based on correct expectations will ultimately result in a reduction of conduct problems, especially in those children and adolescents who have difficulties anticipating that an action will result in a reward or punishment.

In CBT, after children and adolescents have come up with solutions, the therapist asks questions about the consequences of these solutions and about possible alternative solutions in view of making the decision of an appropriate response: ‘What do you think will happen if you do or say that? Will that help solve the problem? What is the direct effect for yourself and for the other? And what is the effect in a week or a month? Is that an appropriate thing to do? Are there other ways to solve the problem?’ Whether just discussing these topics in CBT is sufficient to change children’s and adolescent’s decision-making process remains an open question.

Here, we suggest two approaches that may facilitate the learning processes involved in making appropriate decisions in everyday life situations. First, children and adolescents with conduct problems need to actually experience that appropriate behaviors result in positive consequences. Therefore, therapists in their work with parents, foster parents, and child care workers teach them how to elicit and then reinforce appropriate responses in the child or adolescent. Second, therapists teach parents and other adults how they can assist the child or the adolescent in evaluating various responses and selecting the response for enactment that is most appropriate for him or her not only on the short term (e.g., in terms of reaching a goal for the child himself) but also on the long term (e.g., in terms of positive consequences for the relationship with the other person) (in vivo practice). Parents can learn to ask their child questions such as those previously mentioned. Children and adolescents with conduct problems, however, may have difficulty in making appropriate decisions because response choices are less guided by expectations that an action will result in reward relative to punishment. Therapists, therefore, remind parents, foster parents, and child care workers that much repetition is needed to improve the child’s or adolescent’s decision making. Likewise, CBT therapists may assist teachers in implementing this approach that includes both a behavioral and a cognitive component.

Response Inhibition

A precondition for using social problem-solving skills is that the tendency to respond impulsively is suppressed. Children with conduct problems are typically action oriented in their social thinking (Lochman & Lampron, 1986 ; Matthys et al., 1995 ). So becoming aware that they are encountering a social problem and should think before acting can be a difficult step for them to make in everyday life. In other words, response inhibition or inhibitory control of impulses which is one of the executive functions that regulate people’s thinking and behaviors (Diamond, 2013 ; Miyake & Friedman, 2012 ), can be a serious issue for children and adolescents with conduct problems. Impaired response inhibition can prevent them from starting the social problem-solving process and may affect social problem-solving steps such as deciding which response to select among the responses generated (Van Nieuwenhuijzen et al., 2017 ). While impaired response inhibition should not be expected in children and adolescents with conduct problems as impulsivity is a typical characteristic of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and not of ODD or CD, the latter disorders and ADHD often co-occur (Angold et al., 1999 ).

Deficits in response inhibition have not only been found in elementary school children with ADHD, but also in children with conduct problems without comorbid ADHD (Oosterlaan et al., 1998 ). Similarly, impairments in inhibition were observed for both preschool children with ADHD and preschool children with conduct problems with and without ADHD comorbidity relative to typically developing children (Schoemaker et al., 2012 ). In contrast, adolescents with ADHD, conduct problems, and autism spectrum disorder show a high number of failed inhibitions on a Go/NoGo task relative to typically developing children. However, post hoc analyses suggest that ADHD symptoms may be in part driving the increased level of unsuccessfully inhibited no-go trials in the conduct problems group (Leno et al, 2018 ). Even if this would be the case, given the co-occurrence of ADHD symptoms and conduct problems at a greater than random rate (Waschbusch, 2002 ), impaired response inhibition is still relevant for the conduct problems group (see systematic review and meta-analysis by Bonham et al., 2021 ). In addition, when motivational factors such as reward and punishment are included in response inhibition tasks (e.g., the response perseveration task), impairments in these so-called ‘hot executive functions’ seem to be clearly associated with conduct problems (Matthys et al., 1998 , 2004 ), and even more than with ADHD (Van Goozen et al., 2004 ). For reviews of the neuroimaging literature, see Rubia ( 2011 ) and Noordermeer et al. ( 2016 ).

In a review of fMRI studies, Blair et al. ( 2018 ) conclude that studies examining different paradigms involving response inhibition (as a ‘cold executive function’) report no differences in recruitment of regions implicated in response control, including the inferior frontal gyrus, anterior insular cortex, and dorsomedial frontal cortex, between children and adolescents with conduct problems and controls. The authors note that several of these studies excluded youth with conduct problems with comorbid ADHD. A study that did not control for the presence of ADHD showed reduced anterior insular activity on a cognitive interference (Stroop) task. The extent of impairment did not particularly relate to severity of conduct problems but did positively correlate to ADHD symptom severity (Hwang et al., 2016 ). In our opinion, this does not make the finding any less relevant. As ADHD often is associated with conduct problems (Angold et al., 1999 ), impaired response inhibition may be a characteristic of the child or adolescent referred for the treatment of conduct problems. In sum, response inhibition may be impaired in children and adolescents with conduct problems either due to the association with ADHD (symptoms) or to motivational demands (reward and punishment) included.

With regard to social problem solving, impaired response inhibition can prevent children and adolescents with conduct problems from starting the thinking process before acting, especially those with either comorbid ADHD or associated ADHD symptoms. Impaired response inhibition may also affect these children’s and adolescents’ social problem solving such as generating solutions and making decisions. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether enhancing response inhibition through training programs (see further Kofler et al., 2018 , 2020 ) affects social problem solving in everyday life and ultimately results in a reduction of conduct problems, especially in those children and adolescents with either comorbid ADHD or associated ADHD symptoms. Likewise, an efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether enhancing response inhibition by psychostimulants in children and adolescents with conduct problems and ADHD comorbidity affects social problem solving in everyday life and ultimately results in a reduction of conduct problems.

In CBT, thinking prior to acting is a theme. In a study of the child component of Coping Power, effectiveness of group delivery was compared to individual delivery. According to teachers, children with low levels of inhibitory control appeared to profit more from individual delivery of Coping Power than children with high levels of inhibitory control, suggesting that individual delivery offers opportunities for tailoring CBT to children’s individual needs (Lochman et al., 2015 ).

Although thinking prior to acting is addressed by CBT, the issue of starting the thinking process when children and adolescents are facing a social problem in everyday life at home and at school probably may need more attention. We, therefore, suggest that CBT therapists instruct parents, foster parents, child care workers, and teachers to assist the child or adolescent in withstanding his or her impulsive urges by engaging into the thinking process of social problem solving that children and adolescents learn in CBT during daily life (in vivo practice). When children or adolescents ask for help when they face a social problem, parents and teachers assist the child or adolescent if necessary by asking questions like: ‘What is the problem? What are some solutions?’ etc. Likewise, when parents and teachers see the problem arise before their eyes, they can ask those questions. It is, however, complicated when the problem occurs out of sight of adults. It may help to discuss with the child and adolescent in CBT the type of social situation he or she finds particularly difficult to deal with. For example, when the child finds out that he or she has been left out of a group, game, or activity of peers or when a peer performs better than the child in a game (Dodge et al., 1985 ; Matthys et al., 2001 ). When children and adolescents know which social situation is problematic for them, this awareness can help them to engage in the thinking process and ask themselves questions on how to solve the problem.

In line with a conceptual framework for combined neurocognitive and skill-based treatment approaches for youth with ADHD (Chacko et al., 2014 ), we suggest that executive function training programs are included in the treatment of children and adolescents with conduct problems and poor response inhibition associated with ADHD. While training programs targeting working memory and response inhibition have been less successful than initially anticipated, results of recent studies on central executive training targeting working memory, with effects on response inhibition and hyperactivity, are promising (Kofler et al., 2018 , 2020 ). In a review of interventions and approaches for improving executive functions, Diamond and Ling ( 2016 ) suggest that while challenging of executive functions is necessary for improving them, benefits of improving executive functions will be greater if children’s and adolescents’ emotional, social, and physical needs are also addressed. For instance, stress, sadness, loneliness, not enough sleep, and lack of physical activity have a negative impact on executive functioning (Diamond & Ling, 2016 ). Parents can, therefore, create conditions (e.g., healthy life style) for their child to make optimal use of their executive functions among which response inhibition.

Affective Empathy

Empathy is the understanding of another’s emotional state (cognitive empathy) as well as the ability of sharing/feeling another’s emotional state (affective empathy). The cognitive aspect involves finding out or inferring and understanding another person's emotional state (e.g., sadness, fear, or pain). The affective aspect includes the emotional response to ourselves in perceiving the other person's feeling. In particular, this emotional response is appropriate to or congruent with another’s situation than to one’s own (Eisenberg & Fabes, 1990 ; Hoffman, 1984 ; Moul et al., 2018 ). Empathy is associated with prosocial behavior such as helping and comforting others and contributes to the inhibition of antisocial and aggressive behavior (Eisenberg & Miller, 1987 ; Miller & Eisenberg, 1988 ). However, systematic and meta-analytic reviews of empathy show considerable inconsistencies in the assumed association between empathy and conduct problems. Differences in the measures used and the conceptualization of empathy have been suggested to, at least in part, contribute to the heterogeneous findings (Moul et al., 2018 ).

Lack of empathy is one of cardinal features of callous-unemotional (CU) traits (Frick et al., 2014 ). In the DSM-5, CU traits are labeled as ‘limited prosocial emotions,’ a diagnostic specifier for individuals who meet full criteria for Conduct Disorder. Limited prosocial emotions include the following characteristics: lack of empathy, lack of remorse or guilt, shallow or deficient effect, and unconcerned about performance (American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ). Children and adolescents with both severe conduct problems and elevated CU traits are at risk for more severe and persistent antisocial outcomes (Frick et al., 2014 ). They also tend to be less responsive to psychological treatment (Frick et al., 2014 ).

Blair ( 1995 ) suggested that in humans, a victim’s pain and distress induce similar feelings of distress in the aggressor, which in turn stops further aggressive behavior. Children and adolescents with a deficit in this mechanism will be less likely to learn to avoid harming other individuals, because the distress of other individuals is less aversive for them. These children and adolescents are, therefore, more likely to continue displaying behaviors that harm others to achieve their goals.

Distress-related cues, particularly fearful expressions, play an important role in inhibiting antisocial behavior (Blair, 2001 ). A meta-analysis showed a strong association between antisocial behavior and deficits in recognizing fearful expressions (Marsh & Blair, 2008 ). Consistent with this, in an fMRI study, children and adolescents with conduct problems and CU traits showed reduced amygdala responsiveness during the presentation of fearful facial expressions in comparison to healthy controls and youth with ADHD. Interestingly, functional connectivity analyses demonstrated lower correlations between the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in youth with conduct problems and CU traits as compared to healthy controls and youth with ADHD (Marsh et al., 2008 ). Impairments in amygdala-ventromedial prefrontal cortex connectivity are suggested to be associated with antisocial behavior as a result of instrumental behavior that is inappropriately modulated by others’ distress (Marsh et al., 2008 ). In addition, adolescents with conduct problems and psychopathic traits, including reduced empathy and guilt, showed reduced activity in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex, ventral striatum, and amygdala in response to observing increased pain in others (Marsh et al., 2013 ). Also, reduced activity in the insula while viewing others being harmed was related to children’s greater CD symptoms and CU traits (Michalska et al., 2016 ). Interestingly, reduced left anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus responses in adolescents with conduct problems and CU traits relative to normal controls were found when participants were asked to judge their own emotional reactions to fearful and angry expressions (Klapwijk et al., 2016 ). These findings suggest that adolescents with conduct problems and CU traits resonate less with the feelings of others (Klapwijk et al., 2016 ). Impairments in affective empathy have also been demonstrated in children and adolescents with conduct problems without CU traits (Martin-Key et al., 2017 ) and in children aged 7–11 years with disruptive behavior referred into a crime prevention program (Hunnikin et al., 2020 ).

Difficulties in affective empathy in response to other’s distress can result in the maintenance of aggressive behavior. An efficacy study can test the hypothesis whether improving affective empathy, in particular in response to other’s distress, using virtual reality (see further Dellazizzo et al., 2019 ), affects aggressive behavior, especially in those children and adolescents with limited prosocial emotions.

Currently, in CBT, much attention is given to perspective taking, in particular understanding another person’s intentions as children and adolescents with aggressive behavior are inclined to attribute hostile intentions to others (De Castro et al., 2002 ; Verhoef et al., 2019 ). Attention is also given to better understand the emotions of others, but whereas cognitive empathy is a central theme, affective empathy is not. Here, we suggest that improving affective empathetic responding, in particular in response to other’s distress, should be a target in CBT. Children and adolescents with conduct problems, especially those with limited prosocial emotions, must learn to pay attention to the child’s distress towards whom they start displaying aggressive behavior and must experience themselves how it feels like if this is done to them, with a view to stopping this behavior. This requires a lot of practice, possibly adding virtual reality, as individuals tend to respond realistically to virtual simulations of real-life events (Dellazizzo et al., 2019 ), to the everyday life situations. Parents, foster parents, child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment centers, and teachers can learn how to help the child or adolescent in paying attention to peer’s distress when the child or adolescent starts showing behavior that physically and/or mentally harms others (in vivo practice).

Lack of remorse or guilt is another characteristic of limited prosocial emotions, related to lack of empathy. The amygdala plays a role in care-based moral judgements (Blair, 2007 ). As already discussed, reduced amygdala responsiveness to the distress of other individuals has been shown in children and adolescents with conduct problems and with CU traits (Marsh et al., 2008 ). In line with this, adolescents with conduct problems and psychopathic traits showed reduced amygdala activity when making judgements about legal/illegal actions; thus, psychopathic traits appear to be associated with these adolescents’ ability to attach the appropriate valence to actions of varying moral permissibility (Marsh et al., 2011 ). These findings suggest that for adolescents with conduct problems and limited prosocial emotions, it is appropriate to include moral reasoning in CBT (see Aggression Replacement Training; Goldstein et al., 1998 ), for example in the context of generating solutions to social problems. A slow learning process must be taken into account here as well.

The mean effect size of psychotherapy for conduct problems in children and adolescents has been shown to decrease over the last 50 years (1963–2016), suggesting that adjustments are needed in some of the approaches that have been followed thus far (Weisz et al., 2019 ). Most evidence-based CBT programs were developed during the last three decades of the previous century and only slightly updated in the present century. Results of neuroimaging research into a series of psychological functions have not been incorporated in this update: anger recognition, the ability to generate appropriate solutions to social problems, reinforcement-based decision making, response inhibition, and affective empathy. We propose that these psychological functions deserve more attention in CBT and that working on these psychological abilities only during CBT sessions is not sufficient. Children’s and adolescents’ use of these psychological abilities in everyday life, on the other hand, must be elicited, supported, and reinforced by parents, foster parents, or child care workers in day treatment and residential centers. Therefore, parents or other adults must be intensively involved in the CBT of their child, by participating in part of the sessions, but especially by finding out, with the help of the therapist, how the learning processes of which the first steps were taken in the sessions can be continued in everyday life.

In addition, the increased child’s and adolescent’s competence to use cognitive skills goes hand in hand with learning behavioral skills. For example, a prerequisite for generating an appropriate solution or for selecting an appropriate one between different solutions generated is that children and adolescents have experienced that appropriate solutions work for them and as a result become part of their behavioral repertoire. Thus, therapists and parents, foster parents and child care workers in day treatment and residential treatment centers, need also to work on the improvement of the child’s or adolescent’s behavioral repertoire using the typical parenting skills targeted in behavioral parent training such as giving positive instructions and praising. If these appropriate behaviors work for the child and the adolescent and are perceived as rewarding by them, they are stored in long-term memory, can be generated as possible responses, and finally chosen as the best response based on positive outcomes both on the short and long term. Much perseverance is needed here before associations between responses and reward are made due to problems in making these associations.

The developing brain of children and adolescents is plastic and exhibits greater learning capacity as compared to the adult brain. It is, therefore, not unreasonable to assume that psychological-based interventions at a relatively early age have a positive and lasting effect on brain maturation and neural organization (Ismael et al., 2017 ). There is, for instance, evidence that experience-based brain plasticity can have positive effects paralleled by associated functional as well as structural neuroanatomical changes in children with ADHD (Hoekzema et al., 2011 ). In addition to making use of these developmental windows of opportunity by promoting learning during CBT sessions as well as in the everyday life setting, promoting a healthy life style is likely to have positive effects as well (Diamond & Ling, 2016 ). For example, a balanced eating diet, sufficient amount of sleep, and physical activity (e.g., sports) may improve learning and executive functioning which, in turn, enhance psychological functions associated with anger regulation and social problem solving.

Just as children and adolescents with conduct problems differ in symptoms (e.g., reactive aggression and CU traits), so they differ in the psychological functions that need to be specifically addressed, such as anger recognition, generating appropriate solutions, or affective empathic responding. Therefore, CBT should be tailored to the individual psychological disabilities. In addition to working with the child or adolescent, engaging parents or other adults provide an opportunity for the therapist to personalize CBT. A modular approach as first used in CBT for anxiety disorders and subsequently for other types of psychopathology may be appropriate here (Chorpita et al., 2004 ; Evans et al., 2020 ). A modular approach preserves the benefits of standardization of manualized protocols, while, at the same time, modules can be flexibly arranged so that the content, order, and dose are adjusted to the child and adolescent characteristics. If deemed appropriate, the use of individual or group sessions can also be included in this approach.

Group format is engaging for children and adolescents and offers many opportunities for modeling. However, group formats can sometimes be unnecessarily long for individual children or adolescents if they already display specific anger management or social problem-solving skills in their repertoire. If this is the case, then the number of group sessions with the child or adolescent can be reduced to make room for individual sessions tailored to the individual characteristics of the child’s or adolescent’s psychological functions that need improvement.

For example, psychoeducational group sessions are aimed at introducing the set of anger management and social problem-solving skills that will be worked on in individual sessions later. Thus, children and adolescents first become familiar with the cognitive and behavioral skills during group psychoeducational sessions on anger management (one module) and social problem solving (another module). Subsequently, in individual sessions in which the parents or other adults (e.g., child care workers) and the child or adolescent participate, parents learn to elicit, support, and reinforce their child’s use of anger management skills (several modules) and social problem-solving skills (several modules) during everyday life. In these individual sessions, working on the psychological functions is tailored to the individual child’s characteristic impaired functions. Homework assignments are used to practice skills tailored to the individual child, adolescent, and parent at home. With regard to effectiveness of individual versus group delivery of CBT, according to parents, individual delivery of the child component of Coping Power was as effective as group delivery, whereas according to teachers, individual delivery was more effective (Lochman et al., 2015 ).

For the improvement of anger management and social problem-solving skills, a lot of practice is needed. The school offers unique opportunities for this. Indicated preventive interventions that also target children with clinical levels of conduct problems, have chosen the school as the social context for intervention, also for practical reasons. The Fast Track project has shown that the intervention’s impact on the prevention of later crime and to a lesser extent of general and mental health problems can be accounted for by improvements in self-regulation and problem-solving skills (Sorenson et al., 2016 ). Children and adolescents spend a lot of time at school in a wide variety of social contexts that may be a problem for them, such as situations in which the child is being disadvantaged or must cope with competition (Dodge et al., 1985 ; Matthys et al., 2001 ). Although the learning processes aimed at anger regulation and social problem solving are initiated in the CBT sessions, they must be given a chance to continue at school. Therefore, the CBT therapist shares crucial learning topics for the student with the teacher with a view to creating learning opportunities for the student. Just like parents, teachers may also have collaborative discussions with students how to proactively and collaboratively solve daily social problems (Greene, 1998 ; Ollendick et al., 2016 ).

Engaging families in psychological treatment for conduct problems is challenging (Acri et al., 2018 ). Data from 262 studies for example showed that at least 25% of the parents of children aged 2–12 years identified as appropriate for behavioral parent training do not start treatment, and an additional 26% begin, but drop out before completing treatment (Chacko et al., 2016 ). When behavioral parent training is the only psychological therapy suggested by the clinician who performed the clinical evaluation of the child or adolescent, parents may not start treatment because they think that their parenting skills are of a sufficient level and their child has to deal with his or her problems. These parents may be right as it has been shown that not all families benefit equally from behavioral parent training, in part because parenting skills in some families are not clearly inappropriate (Van Aar et al., 2019 ). Also, parents may drop out of treatment after a few sessions because they think their parenting skills have now reached an adequate level and the child now needs to work on his or her problems. So involving the child himself or herself in the treatment either from the start or after a series of behavioral parent training sessions in order to improve his or her anger regulation and social problem-solving skills may increase the likelihood that the treatment will start or be completed.

There is consensus among clinical researchers that children derive increasing benefit from CBT with increasing age (Fairchild et al., 2019 ). Adding CBT to behavioral parent training may increase the effect of behavioral parent training in children aged from 7 years on. Kazdin and colleagues examined whether the combination of Problem-Solving Skills Training (a CBT program) and Parent Management Training (a behavioral parent training program) generated an intervention that was more potent than either treatment alone in children with conduct problems aged 7–13 years (Kazdin et al., 1992 ). The combined treatment led to more marked changes in antisocial behavior of the child and in parental stress than Problem-Solving Skills Training only and Parent Management Training only. The effect was also evident in the proportion of children that the combined treatment placed within the normative range of functioning in comparison with either treatment alone (Kazdin et al., 1992 ).

For the treatment of adolescents with conduct problems, CBT can be added to family-based psychotherapy (e.g., Functional Family Therapy; Alexander et al., 2013 ) or may become part of interventions targeting multiple systems (e.g., Multisystemic Therapy; Henggeler et al., 2009 ). Increasing the effectiveness of CBT for adolescents is needed as a meta-analysis of Multisystemic Therapy, specifically indicated for adolescents with the most severe conduct problems such as violent offenders and conduct problems associated with substance abuse, showed small effect sizes: d  = 0.20 for delinquency and d  = 0.29 for psychopathology (Van der Stouwe et al., 2014 ). Likewise, as already mentioned, the ES of CBT in youths treated for antisocial behavior in residential settings is only d  = 0.25 (Armelius & Andreassen, 2007 ).

Finally, the perspective we adopted was a non-systematic review of the available neuroimaging literature to examine the neural basis of psychological functions that are implicated in the effectiveness of CBT programs. However, we acknowledge that the number of neuroimaging studies is limited. In addition to the five psychological functions discussed in the present review, other psychological functions, such as working memory, which are not included in the CBT programs may be relevant as well.

Although the literature on anger regulation and social problem solving is extensive, the present review of functional neuroimaging studies suggests that some psychological functions targeted in CBT may need more attention: anger recognition, the ability to generate situation appropriate solutions to social problems, reinforcement-based decision making, response inhibition, and affective empathy. Directly following from the observations that these psychological functions may be impaired in conduct problems, a number of suggestions to increase therapeutic effectiveness of CBT were made. While these require a close collaboration of the therapist with parents, teachers and child care workers in day treatment and residential centers, taking into consideration specific psychological dysfunctions may be beneficial to improving the effectiveness of CBT in the treatment of conduct problems.

This work was supported by an NWO Innovational research Grant VI.C.181.005 (D.S.).

Declarations

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Not applicable.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

  • Acri, M., Chacko, A., Gopalan, G., & McKay, M. (2018). Engaging families in treatment for child behavior disorders: A synthesis of the literature. In J. E. Lochman, & W. Matthys (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of disruptive and impulsive-control disorders (pp. 393–409). Wiley.
  • Alegria AA, Radua J, Rubia K. Meta-analysis of fMRI studies of disruptive behavior disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2016; 173 :1119–1130. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15081089. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Alexander, J. F., Waldron, H. B., Robbins, M. S., & Neeb, A. A. (2013). Functional family therapy for adolescent behavior problems . American Psychological Association.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association.
  • Angold A, Costello EJ, Erkanli A. Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1999; 40 :57–87. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00424. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Armelius BA, Andreassen TH. Cognitive-behavioral treatment for antisocial behavior in youth in residential treatment. Cochrane Database Systematic Review. 2007 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005650.pub2. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Augimeri LK, Farrington DP, Koegl CJ, Day DM. The SNAP under 12 outreach project: Effects of a community based program for children with conduct problems. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2007; 16 :799–807. doi: 10.1007/sl10826-006-9126-x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Averbeck BB, Costa VD. Motivational neural circuits underlying reinforcement learning. Nature Neuroscience. 2017; 20 :505–512. doi: 10.1038/nn.4506. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Blair RJR. A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition. 1995; 57 :1–29. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-P. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Blair RJR. Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 2001; 71 :727–731. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.6.727. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Blair RJR. The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007; 11 :387–392. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Blair RJR. Psychopathy, frustration, and reactive aggression: The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex. British Journal of Psychology. 2010; 101 :383–399. doi: 10.1348/000712609X418418480. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Blair RJ, Morris JS, Frith CD, Perrett DI, Dolan RJ. Dissociable neural responses to facial expressions of sadness and anger. Brain. 1999; 122 :883–893. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.5.883. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Blair RJR, Veroude K, Buitelaar JK. Neuro-cognitive system dysfunction and symptom sets: A review of fMRI studies in youth with conduct problems. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews. 2018; 81 :69–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.022. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bonham MD, Shanley DC, Waters A, Elvin OM. Inhibitory control deficits in children with oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder compared to attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology. 2021; 49 :39–62. doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00713-9. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bowen KL, Morgan JE, Moore SC, Van Goozen SH. Young offenders' emotion recognition dysfunction across emotion intensities: Explaining variation using psychopathic traits, conduct disorder and offense severity. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2016; 66 :60–74. doi: 10.1007/s10862-013-9368-2. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Burke JD, Loeber R. The effectiveness of the Stop Now and Plan (SNAP) program for boys at risk for evidence and delinquency. Prevention Science. 2015; 16 :242–253. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0490-2. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chacko A, Kofler M, Jarrett M. Improving outcomes for youth with ADHD: A conceptual framework for combined neurocognitive and skill-base treatment approaches. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2014; 17 :368–384. doi: 10.1007/s10567-014-0171-5. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chacko, A., Jensen, S. A., Lowry, L. S., Cornwell, M., Chimklis, A., Chan, Lee, D., & Pulgarin, B Engagement in behavioral parent training: Review of the literature and implications for practice. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2016; 19 :204–215. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0205-2. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chorpita BF, Taylor AA, Francis SE, Moffitt C, Austin AA. Efficacy of modular cognitive behavior therapy for childhood anxiety disorders. Behavior Therapy. 2004 doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80039-X. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Cohn MD, Veltman DJ, Pape LE, van Lith K, Vermeiren RRJM, Van den Brink W, Doreleijers TAH, Popma A. Incentive processing in persistent disruptive behavior and psychopathic traits: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in adolescents. Biological Psychiatry. 2015; 78 :615–624. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.017. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Costa VD, Averbeck BB. Primate orbitofrontal cortex codes information relevant for managing explore-exploit tradeoffs. Journal of Neuroscience. 2020; 40 :2553–2561. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSC.2355-19-2020. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Crick NR, Dodge KA. A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin. 1994; 115 :74–101. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • De Castro BO, Veerman JW, Koops W, Bosch JD, Monshouwer HJ. Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development. 2002; 73 :916–934. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00447. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dellazizzo L, Potvin S, Bahig S, Dumains A. Comprehensive review on virtual reality for the treatment of violence: Implications for youth with schizophrenia. Npj Schizophrenia. 2019; 5 :11. doi: 10.1038/s41537-019-0079-7. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013; 64 :135–168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Diamond A, Ling DS. Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2016; 18 :34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dodge, K. A., Godwin, J., & The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group Social-information-processing patterns mediate the impact of preventive intervention on adolescent antisocial behavior. Psychological Science. 2013; 24 :456–465. doi: 10.1177/0956797612457394. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dodge KA, McClaskey CL, Feldman E. Situational approach to the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1985; 53 :344–353. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.53.3.344. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dodge KA, Pettit GS, McClaskey CL, Brown MM. Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1986 doi: 10.2307/1165906. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Eisenberg N, Fabes RA. Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion. 1990; 14 :131–149. doi: 10.1007/BF0991640. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Eisenberg N, Miller PA. The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin. 1987; 101 :91–119. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Evans, S. C., Weisz, J. R., Carvalho, A. C., Garibaldi, P. M., Bearman, S. K., Chorpita, B. F., & Research Network on Youth Mental Health Effects of standard and modular psychotherapies in the treatment of youth with severe irritability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2020; 88 :255–268. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000456. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Fairchild G, Hagan CC, Passamonti L, Walsh ND, Goodyer IM, Calder AJ. Atypical neural responses during face processing in female adolescents with conduct disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2014; 53 :677–687. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.02.009. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Fairchild G, Hawes DJ, Frick PJ, Copeland WE, Odgers CL, Franke B, Freitag CM, De Brito SA. Conduct disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2019; 27 (5):43. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0095-y. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Fairchild G, Van Goozen SHM, Calder AJ, Stollery SJ, Goodyer IM. Deficits in facial expression recognition in male adolescents with early-onset and late-onset conduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2009; 50 :627–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02020.x. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Ridder EM. Show me the child at seven: The consequences of conduct problems in childhood for psychosocial functioning in adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2005; 46 :837–849. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.00387.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Finger EC, Marsh AA, Blair KS, Reid ME, Sims C, Ng P, Pine DS, Blair RJ. Disrupted reinforcement signaling in the orbitofrontal cortex and caudate in youths with conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder and a high level of psychopathic traits. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2011; 168 :152–162. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10010129. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Fontaine RG, Burks VS, Dodge KA. Response decision processes and externalizing behavior problems in adolescents. Development and Psychopathology. 2002; 14 :107–122. doi: 10.1017/s0954579402001062. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Frick PJ, Ray JV, Thornton LC, Kahn RE. Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin. 2014; 140 :1–57. doi: 10.1037/a0033076. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Garland AF, Hawley KM, Brookman-Frazee L, Hurlburt MS. Identifying common elements for evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children’s disruptive behavior problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2008; 46 :505–514. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31816765c2. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Goldstein, A. D., Glick, B., & Gibbs, J. C. (1998). Aggression Replacement Training: A comprehensive intervention for aggressive youth (revised edition) . Research Press.
  • Greene, R. W. (1998). The explosive child: A new approach for understanding and parenting easily frustrated, “chronically inflexible” children . HarperCollins.
  • Hare TA, O'Doherty J, Camerer CF, Schultz W, Rangel A. Dissociating the role of the orbitofrontal cortex and the striatum in the computation of goal values and prediction errors. Journal of Neuroscience. 2008; 28 :5623–5630. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1309-08.2008. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Henggeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Borduin, C. M., Rowland, M. D., & Cunningham, P. B. (2009). Multisystemic therapy for antisocial behavior in children and adolescents (second edition) . The Guilford Press.
  • Hoekzema E, Carmona S, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Barba E, Bielsa A, Tremols V, Rovira M, Soliva JC, Casas M, Bulbena A, Tobeña A, Vilarroya O. Training-induced neuroanatomical plasticity in ADHD: A tensor-based morphometric study. Human Brain Mapping. 2011; 32 :1741–1749. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21143. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In C. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonic (Eds.), Emotions, cognitions and behavior. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hornsveld RHJ, Kraaimaat FW, Muris P, Zwets AJ, Kanters T. Aggression replacement training for violent young men in a forensic psychiatric outpatient clinic. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2015; 30 :3174–3191. doi: 10.1177/0886260514555007. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hubbard JA, McAuliffe MD, Morrow MT, Romano LJ. Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: Precursors, outcomes, processes, experiences, and measurement. Journal of Personality. 2010; 78 :95–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00610.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hunnikin LM, Wells AE, Ash DP, Van Goozen SHM. The nature and extent of emotion recognition and empathy impairments in children showing disruptive behavior referred into a criminal prevention programme. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2020; 29 :363–371. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01358-w. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hwang S, Nolan ZT, White SF, Williams WC, Sinclair S, Blair RJR. Dual neurocircuitry dysfunctions in disruptive behavior disorders: Emotional responding and response inhibition. Psychological Medicine. 2016; 46 :1485–1496. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000118. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ismael FY, Fatemi A, Johnston MV. Cerebral plasticity: Windows of opportunity in the developing brain. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 2017; 21 :23–48. doi: 10.1016/j.e.jpn.2016.07.007. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kaminski JW, Klaussen AH. Evidence base update for psychosical treatment for disruptive behaviors in children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2017; 46 :477–499. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1310044. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Parent management training. Treatment for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behaviour in children and adolescents. Oxford University Press.
  • Kazdin AE, Bass D, Siegel T, Thomas C. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and relationship therapy in the treatment of children referred for antisocial behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1989; 57 :522–535. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.57.4.522. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kazdin A, Esveldt-Dawson K, French NH, Unis AS. Problem-solving skills training and relationship therapy in the treatment of antisocial child behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1987; 55 :76–85. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.55.76. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kazdin AE, Siegel TC, Bass D. Cognitive problem-solving skill training and parent management training in the treatment of antisocial behavior in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1992; 60 :733–747. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.60.5.733. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kim-Cohen J, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Harrington H, Milne BJ, Poulton R. Prior juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder: Developmental follow-back of a prospective-longitudinal cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2003; 60 :709–717. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.709. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Klapwijk ET, Afgajani M, Colins OF, Marijnissen GM, Popma A, Van Lang NDJ, Van der Wee NJA, Vermeiren RRJM. Different brain responses during empathy in autism spectrum disorders versus conduct disorder and callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2016; 57 :737–747. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12498. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kofler MJ, Wells EL, Singh LJ, Soto EF, Irwin LN, Groves NB, Chan ESM, Miller CE, Richmond KP, Schatschneider C, Lonigan CJ. A randomized controlled trial of central executive training (CET) versus inhibitory control training (ICT) for ADHD. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2020; 88 :738–756. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000550. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kofler, M. J., Sarver, D. E., Austin, K. E., Schaeffer, H. S., Holland, E., Aduan, P. A., Wells, E. L., Soto, E. F., Irwin, L. N., Groves, Schatschneider, C., & Lonigan, C. J Can working memory training work for ADHD? Development of central executive training and comparison with behavioral parent training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2018; 86 :964–979. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000308. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kohls G, Baumann S, Gundlach M, Scharke W, Berhard A, Martinelli A, et al. Investigating sex differences in emotion recognition, learning and regulation among youths with conduct disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2020; 59 :263–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.04.003. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Leijten P, Gardner F, Melendez-Torres GJ, Van Aar J, Hutchings J, Schulz S, Knerr W, Overbeek G. Meta-analyses: Key parenting components for disruptive child behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2019; 58 :180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2018.07.900. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Leno VC, Chandler S, White P, Pickles A, Baird G, Hobson C, Smith AB, Charman T, Rubia K, Simonoff E. Testing the specificity of executive functioning impairments in adolescents with ADHD, ODD/CD and ASD. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2018; 27 :899–908. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1089-5. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lochman JE, Boxmeyer CL, Kassing FL, Powell NP, Stromeyer SL. Cognitive behavioral intervention for youth at risk for conduct problems: Future directions. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2019; 48 :799–810. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2019.1567349. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lochman JE, Dishion TJ, Powell NP, Boxmeyer CL, Qu L, Sallee M. Evidence-based prevention intervention for preadolescent aggressive children: One-year outcomes following randomization to group versus individual delivery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2015; 83 :728–735. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000030. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lochman JE, Lampron LB. Situational social problem solving skills and self-esteem of aggressive and non-aggressive boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1986; 14 :605–617. doi: 10.1007/BF01260527. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lochman JE, Nelson WM, III, Sims JP. A cognitive behavioural program for use with aggressive children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1981; 10 :146–148. doi: 10.1080/15374418109533036. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lochman, J. E., Wells, K. C., & Lenhart, L. A. (2008). Coping power child group program: Facilitator guide. Oxford.
  • Marsh AA, Blair RJR. Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2008; 32 :454–465. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiorev.2007.08.003. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Marsh AA, Finger EC, Fowler KA, Adalno CJ, Jurkowitz JTN, Schechter JC, Pine DS, Decety J, Blair RJR. Empathic responsiveness in amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex in youths with psychopathic traits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2013; 54 :900–910. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12063. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Marsh AA, Finger EC, Fowler KA, Jurkowitz JTN, Schechter JC, Yu HH, Pine DS, Blair RJR. Reduced amygdala-orbitofrontal connectivity during moral judgements in youths with disruptive behaviour disorders and psychopathic traits. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. 2011; 194 :279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.psychresns.2011.07.008. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Marsh AA, Finger EC, Mitchell DGV, Reid M, Sims C, Kosson DS, Towbin KE, Leibenluft E, Pine DS, Blair RJR. Reduced amygdala response to fearful expressions in children and adolescents with callous-unemotional traits and disruptive behaviour disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2008; 165 :712–720. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07071145. . [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Martin-Key N, Brown T, Fairchild G. Empathic accuracy in male adolescents with conduct disorder and higher versus lower levels of callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2017; 45 :1385–1397. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0243-8. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Matthys W, Cuperus J, Van Engeland H. Deficient social problem-solving in boys with ODD/CD, with ADHD, and with both disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1999; 38 :311–321. doi: 10.1097/00004583-19993000-00019. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Matthys, W., & Lochman, J. E. (2017). Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder in childhood . (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Matthys W, Maassen GH, Cuperus JM, Van Engeland H. The assessment of the situational specificity of children's problem behaviour in peer-peer context. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2001; 42 :413–420. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00734. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Matthys W, Van Goozen S, De Vries H, Cohen-Kettenis P, Van Engeland H. The dominance of behavioural activation over behavioural inhibition in conduct disordered boys with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1998; 39 :643–651. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00364. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Matthys W, Van Goozen SHM, Snoek H, Van Engeland H. Response perseveration and sensitivity to reward and punishment in boys with oppositional defiant disorder. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2004; 13 :362–364. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-0395-x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Matthys W, Vanderschuren LJMJ, Schutter DJLG. The neurobiology of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder: Altered functioning in three mental domains. Development and Psychopathology. 2013; 25 :193–207. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000272. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Matthys W, Vanderschuren LJMJ, Schutter DJLG, Lochman JE. Impaired neurocognitive functions affect social learning processes in oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: Implications for interventions. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2012; 15 :234–246. doi: 10.1007/s10567-012-0118-7. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Matthys W, Walterbos W, Van Engeland H, Koops W. Conduct disordered boys’ perception of their liked peers. Cognitive Theory & Research. 1995; 19 :357–372. doi: 10.1007/BF02230405. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • McCart MR, Priester PE, Davies WH, Azen R. Differential effectiveness of behavioral parent-training and cognitive-behavioral therapy for antisocial youth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2006; 34 :527–543. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9031-1. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • McCart MR, Sheidow AJ. Evidence-based psychosocial treatment for adolescents with disruptive behaviour. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2016; 45 :529–563. doi: 10.1080//15374416.2016.1146990. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavioral modification: An integrated approach. Guilford.
  • Michalska KJ, Zeffiro TA, Decety J. Brain response to viewing others being harmed in children with conduct disorder symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2016; 57 :510–519. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12474. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Miller PA, Eisenberg N. The relation of empathy and aggression and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin. 1988; 103 :324–344. doi: 10.1037/033-2909.103.3.324. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Miller S, Boxmeyer C, Romero D, Powell N, Jones S, Lochman J. Theoretical model of mindful coping power: Optimizing a cognitive behavioral program for high-risk children and their parents by integrating mindfulness. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2020; 23 :393–406. doi: 10.1007/s10567-020-00312-6. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Miyake A, Friedman NP. The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2012; 21 :8–14. doi: 10.1177/09637211411429458. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Moul C, Hawes DJ, Dadds MR. Mapping the developmental pathway of child conduct problems through the neurobiology of empathy. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2018; 91 :34–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.016. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2013, 2017). Antisocial behavior and conduct disorders in children and young people: Recognition, intervention and management . (Clinical guideline 158) https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG158/chapter/1-Recommendations#psychosocial-interventions-treatment-and-indicated-prevention
  • Noordermeer SDS, Luman M, Oosterlaan J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging in Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) and Conduct Disorder (CD) taking Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) into account. Neuropsychology Review. 2016; 26 :44–72. doi: 10.1007/s11065-015-9315-8. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • O’Doherty JP, Buchanan TW, Seymour B, Dolan RJ. Predictive neural coding of reward preference involves dissociable responses in human ventral midbrain and ventral striatum. Neuron. 2006; 49 :157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.014. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ollendick TH, Greene RW, Austin KE, Fraire MG, Holldorsdottir T, et al. Parent management training and collaborative & proactive solutions: A randomized control trial for oppositional youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2016; 45 :591–604. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1004681. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Oosterlaan J, Logan GD, Sergeant JA. Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious, and control children: A meta-analysis of studies with the stop task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1998; 39 :411–425. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00336. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Passamonti L, Fairchild G, Goodyer IM, Hurford G, Hagan CC, Rowe JB, Calder AJ. Neural abnormalities in early-onset and adolescence-onset conduct disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2010; 67 :729–738. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.75. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Perry DG, Perry LC, Rasmussen P. Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Development. 1986; 57 :700–711. doi: 10.2307/1130347. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Pilling S, Gould N, Whittington C, Taylor C, Scott S. Recognition, intervention and management of antisocial behavior and conduct disorders in children and young people: Summary of NICE-SCIE guidance. British Medical Journal. 2013; 346 :f1298. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1298. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Quiggle NL, Garber J, Panak W, Dodge KA. Social information-processing in aggressive and depressed children. Child Development. 1992; 63 :1305–1320. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01696.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Rivenbark JG, Odgers CL, Caspi A, Harrington H, Hogan S, Houts RM, Poulton R, Moffitt TE. The high societal costs of childhood conduct problems: Evidence from administrative records up to age 38 in a longitudinal birth cohort. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2018; 59 :703–710. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12850. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Rolls ET. The functions of the orbitofrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition. 2004; 55 :11–29. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00277-X. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Rubia K. “Cool” inferior fronstostriatal dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder versus “hot” ventromedial orbitofrontal-limbic dysfunction in conduct disorder: A review. Biological Psychiatry. 2011; 69 :e69–e87. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.023. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Rubia K, Smith AB, Halari R, Matsukara F, Mohammad M, Taylor E, Brammer MJ. Disorder-specific dissociation of orbitofrontal dysfunction in boys with pure conduct disorder during reward and ventrolateral prefrontal dysfunction in boys with pure ADHD during sustained attention. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2009; 166 :83–94. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08020212. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Schoemaker K, Bunte T, Wiebe SA, Espy KA, Deković M, Matthys W. Executive function deficits in preschool children with ADHD and DBD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2012; 53 :111–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02468.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Sorenson, L. C., Dodge, K. A., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Group How does the Fast Track Intervention prevent adverse outcomes in young adulthood. Child Development. 2016; 87 :429–445. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12467. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Spivack, G., & Shure, M. B. (1974). Social adjustment of young children: A cognitive approach to solving real-life problems . Jossey-Bass.
  • Van de Wiel, N. M. H., Matthys, W., Cohen-Kettenis, P., Maassen, G., H., Lochman, J. E., & van Engeland, H The effectiveness of an experimental treatment when compared with Care as Usual depends on the type of Care as Usual. Behavior Modification. 2007; 31 :298–312. doi: 10.1177/0145445506292855. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Van der Stouwe T, Asscher JJ, Stams GJJM, Dekovic M, van der Laan PH. The effectiveness of Multissystemic Therapy (MST): A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2014; 34 :468–481. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.006. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Van Goozen SHM, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Snoek H, Matthys W, Swaab-Barneveld H, Van Engeland H. Executive functioning in children: a comparison of hospitalized ODD and ODD/ADHD children and normal controls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2004; 45 :284–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00220.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Van Nieuwenhuijzen M, Van Rest MM, Embregts PJM, Vriens A, Oostermeijer S, Van Bokhoven I, Matthys W. Executive functions and social information processing in adolescents with severe behavior problems. Child Neuropsychology. 2017; 23 :228–241. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2015.1108396. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Van Rest MM, Van Nieuwenhuijzen M, Kupersmidt JB, Vriens A, Schuengel C, Matthys W. Accidental and ambiguous situations reveal specific iformation processing biases and deficits in adolescents with low clinical level and clinical levels of externalizing behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2020; 48 :1411–1424. doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00676-x. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Van Aar J, Leijten P, Orobio de Castro B, Weeland J, Matthys W, Chhangur R, Overbeek G. Families who benefit and families who do not: Integrating person- and variable-centered analyses of parenting intervention responses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2019; 58 :993–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.02.004. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Verhoef REJ, Alsem SC, Verhulp EE, De Castro BO. Hostile intention attribution and aggressive behaviour in children revisited: A meta-analysis. Child Development. 2019; 90 :e525–547. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13255. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Waschbusch DA. A meta-analytic examination of comorbid hyperactive-impulsive-attention problems and conduct problems. Psychological Bulletin. 2002; 128 :118–150. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.118. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Weisz JR, Kuppens S, Ng MY, Eckshtain D, Ugneto AM, Vaughn-Coaxum R, et al. What five decades of research tell us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. American Psychologist. 2017; 72 :79–117. doi: 10.1037/a0040360. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Weisz JR, Kuppens S, Ng MY, Vaughn-Coaxum RA, Ugneto AM, Eckshtain D, Corteselli KA. Are psychotherapies for young people growing stronger? Tracing trends over time for youth anxiety, depression, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and conduct problems. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2019; 14 :216–337. doi: 10.1177/1745691618805436. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Wells, K. C., Lochman, J. E., & Lenhart, L. A. (2008). Coping power parent group program: Facilitator guide . Oxford.
  • White SF, Fowler KA, Sinclair S, Schechter JC, Majestic CM, Pine DS, Blair RJR. Disrupted expected value signaling in youth with disruptive behavior disorders to environmental reinforcers. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2014; 53 :579–588. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.12.023. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • White SF, Pope KP, Sinclair S, Fowler KA, Brislin SJ, Williams WC, Pine DS, Blair RJR. Disrupted expected value and prediction error signaling in youths with disruptive behavior disorders during a passive avoidance task. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2013; 170 :315–323. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12060840. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • White, S. F., Tyler, P. M., Erway, A. K., Botkin, M. L., Kolli, V., Meffert, H., Pope, K., & Blair, J. R. (2016). Dysfunctional representation of expected value is associated with reinforcement-based decision-making deficits in adolescents with conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57 , 938–946. 10.1111/jcpp.12557 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
  • World Health Association (WHO). (2020). International Classification of Diseases ( ICD-11 ). https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/
  • Zelli, A., Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., Laird, R. D., & The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). The distinction between beliefs legitimizing aggression and deviant processing of social cues: Testing measurement validity and the hypothesis that biased processing mediates the effects of beliefs on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77 , 150–166. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.150 [ PubMed ]
  • Zonnevylle-Bender, M. J. S., Matthys, W., Wiel, N. M. H. van de, & Lochman, J. E. (2007). Preventive effects of treatment of DBD in middle childhood on substance use and delinquent behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 33–39. 10.1097/01.chi.0000246051.53297.57 [ PubMed ]

Need help? Call us at (833) 966-4233

the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

Counselor’s Advice for Better Problem Solving and Decision Making

How to control poor problem solving or impulsivity it’s all about balance.

Have you ever been faced with a dilemma and after addressing it, asked yourself “Why on earth did I do that” or, “what was I thinking”? Personally I have done this and the fact is we all have had these moments. There are times when we try to solve a problem and inadvertently make the situation worse.

Reacting to a problem impulsively can’t be avoided! Right? Some would say “Impulsive actions are caused by an absence of discipline and poor self-control”. I on the other hand, would argue our behavior/ impulses are determined by the state of mind we are in at the time of the triggering situation.

As a clinician, I often use the Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) model of counseling in my practice. DBT is an adaptation of Cognitive Behavior therapy developed by psychologist Marsha Linehan. DBT is an effective therapy model for emotion regulation and one of the main focuses of DBT is mindfulness. When practicing mindfulness, one must understand there are three states of mind: Emotion mind, Reasonable mind and Wise mind.

2. Reasonable mind If emotion mind is high intensity then Reasonable mind would be low intensity. This state of mind is based on rules, logic, facts, data etc. Facts are all that matters and decision are made based on data in this state of mind.

There are advantages and disadvantages to each state of mind. For example, Reasonable mind is great for solving a problem, following a recipe or learning a new task at work. It is challenging to operate in reasonable mind when trying to empathize with a friend or show affection. Many of life’s challenges have an emotional aspect to them.

Emotion mind has its drawbacks as well. Remaining in Emotion mind for an extended amount of time can be exhausting. It would be like driving your car at 100 miles per hour for 8 hours straight; your vehicle would overheat or run out of gas. An advantage to acting in Emotion mind would be the ability to form social or family bonds through affection, empathy and love.

Now that you have become briefly aware of the three states of mind; let’s consider the steps to take to address non effective impulsive behavior and less than desirable problem solving. To begin, STOP before you act and follow these 3 steps…

“Counselor’s Advice 4 Better Problem Solving + Decision Making”

2. Complete a mind check Determine which state of mind you are in by reviewing your thoughts. “Am I thinking emotionally or reasonably”?

In conclusion, Wise mind is achieved when you relate the facts you have learned (Reasonable) to the problem that hurt you (Emotional); then you are being effective.

Will there be times when you find yourself only in Emotion or Reasonable mind? Yes! If it is effective, do not worry. However, if you find yourself thinking “I have no clue why life’s challenges are getting out of hand”; take a moment and ask yourself “Am I in the best state of mind”? It is all about balance…

By Keisha Carter

Tips for Making a Big Decision

I’m writing an article for Newsday and I was hoping someone at Thriveworks Counseling could answer a few questions as soon as possible for the story. The article is about how to decide if you should sell your home or if you should rent it out – and I was wondering if you have any suggestions for how someone should make a decision that could potentially affect them for the rest of their lives. Also, what should readers do if they’re having problems feeling secure in the decision they’re making?

Hi Danielle!

I’m happy to help. I’ll write some ideas below, and if I can be of any additional help, please call me anytime at 1-855-4-THRIVE.

Overview:  These days, many of us are living very fast paced lives, and this means we’re making more decisions than ever.

At some point, all of us get jammed up because each decision we make comes at a cost (or a penalty). If we choose to paint a room blue, the cost is we can’t also have the room be red. If we choose to have steak for dinner, the cost is that we won’t be having fish. And so on…

A big decision, like whether to sell or rent a house, can feel overwhelming. Here are some tips:

1. Put it into perspective.

  • Often when we face an emotionally charged decision it can feel much bigger than it is. While selling a house is a big decision, it is small potatoes in the greater context of one’s life: The career you choose, the city you reside in (Boston or Atlanta?), family planning decisions, etc. A house is just one of many financial planning decisions one will make in throughout their life.

2. Ask other people who have done it. While we want to think we’re unique, our experiences often parallel others’. Ask other people you know who have sold, or rented a house in your community. How did it go? Was the experience positive or negative? Consider that your experience might be similar to theirs.

3. Don’t stress over two good decisions. If both decisions are likely to have positive outcomes, don’t sweat over your choice! You can’t go wrong! To help lower your stress, consider which decision you’ll enjoy more, not which is the “right” decision.

4. Think about regrets. One technique to help make a big decision is to think about the potential for regret. To do this, instead of asking yourself, “which choice is best” Ask yourself “which option could I regret most–to sell my house, or to not sell my house?” This might make the best choice more apparent.

Danielle, I hope this helps! Anthony Centore Ph.D., CEO of Thriveworks –Anthony

Published Jul 5, 2016

Our clinical and medical experts , ranging from licensed therapists and counselors to psychiatric nurse practitioners, author our content, in partnership with our editorial team. In addition, we only use authoritative, trusted, and current sources. This ensures we provide valuable resources to our readers. Read our editorial policy for more information.

Thriveworks was established in 2008, with the ultimate goal of helping people live happy and successful lives. We are clinician-founded and clinician-led. In addition to providing exceptional clinical care and customer service, we accomplish our mission by offering important information about mental health and self-improvement.

We are dedicated to providing you with valuable resources that educate and empower you to live better. First, our content is authored by the experts — our editorial team co-writes our content with mental health professionals at Thriveworks, including therapists, psychiatric nurse practitioners, and more.

We also enforce a tiered review process in which at least three individuals — two or more being licensed clinical experts — review, edit, and approve each piece of content before it is published. Finally, we frequently update old content to reflect the most up-to-date information.

Woman sitting at a computer looking inspired

How to Stay Motivated and Inspired to Achieve Your Goals: 6 Tips

Woman hanging and adjusting pictures

Understanding perfectionism: Causes, impact, and treatment

White woman hiking in the backcountry

What is self-reflection & how to reflect

Want to talk to a therapist? We have over 2,000 providers across the US ready to help you in person or online.

' src=

Thriveworks Staff

Since 2008, Thriveworks practices have been synonymous with exceptional client care and customer service, and we’ve achieved that by being innovators/redefiners in the field.

Discover more

Are you struggling?

Thriveworks can help..

Browse top-rated therapists near you, and find one who meets your needs. We accept most insurances, and offer weekend and evening sessions.

the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

Rated 4.4 from over 14,370 Google reviews

red haired woman city on bench beside tree

The information on this page is not intended to replace assistance, diagnosis, or treatment from a clinical or medical professional. Readers are urged to seek professional help if they are struggling with a mental health condition or another health concern.

If you’re in a crisis, do not use this site. Please call the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or use these resources to get immediate help.

IMAGES

  1. Ms. Sepp's Counselor Corner: S.T.E.P. Problem Solving Method

    the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

  2. Counselor's Advice for Better Problem Solving and Decision Making

    the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

  3. Master Your Problem Solving and Decision Making Skills

    the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

  4. Problem-solving and Decision-making

    the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

  5. What are the problem solving steps?

    the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

  6. Problem Solving and Decision Making

    the use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

VIDEO

  1. Problem solving /Decision making for women entrepreneurs

  2. Sneaky Ways Death Informs Your Decision Making, Behavior + Outcome!

  3. The Surprising Truth about Men's Competitive Nature Explained #shorts

  4. PROBLEM SOLVING & DECISION MAKING _ Bersama Dr. Kiman Siregar

  5. HARD CONVERSATIONS

  6. Learning Objectives Problem Solving & Decision Making Webinar #shorts #managerialskills #analysis

COMMENTS

  1. The use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

    Kanfer, Busemeyer∗ Show more Add to Mendeley Share Cite Get rights and content Abstract An updated model from problem solving and decision making (PS/DM) theory is presented for application to behavior therapy. The article highlights an important distinction between "static" and "dynamic" PS/DM situations.

  2. The use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

    Abstract Presents an updated model from problem-solving and decision-making (PS/DM) theory for application to behavior therapy. The distinction between "static" and "dynamic" PS/DM situations is highlighted. The static model presumes that the PS/DM procedures need to be conducted only once to implement a change program.

  3. Problem-Solving Therapy: Definition, Techniques, and Efficacy

    Problem-solving therapy is a brief intervention that provides people with the tools they need to identify and solve problems that arise from big and small life stressors. It aims to improve your overall quality of life and reduce the negative impact of psychological and physical illness. Problem-solving therapy can be used to treat depression ...

  4. Clinical decision making in behavior therapy: A problem-solving

    In their model, Drs. Nezu and Nezu describe the use of five problem-solving processes, guiding the reader through the judgments and decisions characteristic of the various stages of therapy (e.g., diagnosis and assessment, selection of specific treatment targets and methods, and evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment).

  5. Clinical decision making in the practice of behavior therapy.

    advocate [s] the application of all five problem-solving processes [problem orientation, problem definition and formulation, generation of alternatives, decision making, and solution implementation and verification] across each of the four major therapeutic stages [screening and problem identification, problem analysis and selection of focal tar...

  6. Clinical Decision Making in Behaviour Therapy: A Problem Solving

    Clinical Decision Making in Behaviour Therapy: A Problem Solving Perspective. A. M. Nezu and C. M. Nezu (Eds.), Research Press Co., 1989, pp. 438, $19.95. - Volume 18 Issue 3. Skip to main content Accessibility help We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites.

  7. The use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

    J. Decis. Syst. 2007 This article presents a Problem Solving Process Model for personal decision support (PSPM-DS). The model was used to provide decision support in the counseling of young adults facing difficulties in… Expand 5 2 Excerpts An Introduction to Cognitive-Behavior Therapy A. Lehman P. Salovey Psychology 1990

  8. Strategic Decision Making in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    Strategic decisions. follow logically from the case conceptualization. are arrived upon collaboratively between the therapist and patient. allow the patient to leave the session with something new. are seen through in their entirety before their effectiveness is evaluated. This compelling, accessible book will benefit all cognitive behavioral ...

  9. Clinical decision making in behavioral supervision: "… And how does

    According to the problem-solving model, the decision- making process is guided by the following components (A. M. Nezu & Nezu, 1989): (a) problem orientation (i.e., the set of general beliefs, appraisals, assumptions, values, and expectations regarding problems in general and one's ability to solve them); (b) problem definition and formulation ...

  10. Core Elements of CBT for Adolescent Conduct and Substance Use Problems

    If a problem is not likely to be solved within the session (which is typical when targeting clinically significant behavior problems), suggest working on it over time in therapy, as a way to provide hope for eventual resolution. Finally, decision-making and problem-solving interventions are commonly used in family sessions.

  11. Problem Solving Packet

    worksheet. Guide your clients and groups through the problem solving process with the help of the Problem Solving Packet. Each page covers one of five problem solving steps with a rationale, tips, and questions. The steps include defining the problem, generating solutions, choosing one solution, implementing the solution, and reviewing the process.

  12. The use of problem solving and decision making in behavior therapy

    An updated model from problem solving and decision making (PS/DM) theory is presented for application to behavior therapy. The article highlights an important distinction between "static" and "dynamic" PS/DM situations. The static model presumes that the PS/ DM procedures need to be conducted only once to implement a change program.

  13. 10 Best Problem-Solving Therapy Worksheets & Activities

    "Problem-solving therapy (PST) is a psychosocial intervention, generally considered to be under a cognitive-behavioral umbrella" (Nezu, Nezu, & D'Zurilla, 2013, p. ix). It aims to encourage the client to cope better with day-to-day problems and traumatic events and reduce their impact on mental and physical wellbeing.

  14. Increasing Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Conduct

    According to the most recent large meta-analysis of psychological therapy for children and adolescents treated for mental health problems in the clinical range the mean post-treatment effect size (ES, Cohen's d) for conduct problems is 0.46 (Weisz et al., 2017 ).

  15. The key principles of cognitive behavioural therapy

    Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) explores the links between thoughts, emotions and behaviour. It is a directive, time-limited, structured approach used to treat a variety of mental health disorders. It aims to alleviate distress by helping patients to develop more adaptive cognitions and behaviours. It is the most widely researched and ...

  16. Problem solving and behavior therapy revisited

    Presidential AddressProblem solving and behavior therapy revisited*. The treatment effectiveness project. A comparison of the effectiveness of paroxetine, problem-solving therapy, and placebo in the treatment of minor depression and dysthymia in primary care patients: Background and research plan. Belzer K.D., T.J., A.

  17. The Evidence-Based Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a model of professional decision-making in which practitioners integrate the best available evidence with client values/context and clinical expertise in order to provide services for their clients. This framework provides behavior analysts with a structure for pervasive use of the best available evidence in the ...

  18. Increasing Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Conduct

    Introduction. According to the most recent large meta-analysis of psychological therapy for children and adolescents treated for mental health problems in the clinical range the mean post-treatment effect size (ES, Cohen's d) for conduct problems is 0.46 (Weisz et al., 2017).The effect sizes of several types of psychological therapy for conduct problems, however, differ from each other.

  19. Counselor's Advice for Better Problem Solving and Decision Making

    3. Wise mind This is the goal! Wise mind is the integration of Emotion and Reasonable mind. Decisions made in this state of mind tend to be effective. There are advantages and disadvantages to each state of mind. For example, Reasonable mind is great for solving a problem, following a recipe or learning a new task at work.

  20. Clinical Decision Making in Behavior Therapy: A Problem Solving

    Bring home now the book enPDFd clinical decision making in behavior therapy a problem solving perspective to be your sources when going to read. It can be your new collection to not only display in your racks but also be the one that can help you fining the best sources. As in common, book is the window to get in the world and you can open the world easily.

  21. Trouble Making Decisions? Follow these Guidelines to Combat

    These cognitive strategies come from Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, a problem-solving therapy that can help people with indecisiveness. It is not uncommon for people struggling with anxiety or depression to have problems with decision-making. Click here for more information about how cognitive behavioral therapy may help you.

  22. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and decision science

    The therapist acts similar to a decision-making aid, slowing down the process to avoid the reliance on cognitive distortions, biases and ineffective strategies. The authors conclude that the teaching of decision-making techniques may be a productive use of therapy time for clients with depression.

  23. Preventing Future Crime With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    For instance, in most cognitive behavioral therapy programs, participants improve their social skills, means-ends problem solving, critical reasoning, moral reasoning, cognitive style, self-control, impulse management and self-efficacy.